For Lurkers: Is the cover of the March 15th Watchtower deceptive?

by seek2find 40 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • AK - Jeff
    AK - Jeff

    Interesting article in the 11/1/1953 Watchliar - funny how all the date setters in the past were FALSE ALARMS, but the Watchliars cries are not:

    The hypocricy of these condemnations is amazing;



    FOR Jehovah’s witnesses to be sounding a warning of the end of the present wicked system of things in a fiery Armageddon seems farfetched and wholly inconceivable to this complacent generation. Mockingly they say to Jehovah’s witnesses, ‘We know all about it. Our grandfathers and our great-grandfathers preached the same thing. But, as you see, the world is very much the same. Things will always be this way.’ But those who have lived in both generations, the present and the past, know that things are not the same, that changes have taken place, and that there is no basis for such fruitless reasoning.

    True, many false alarms in the past have been sounded. But does that prove the present alarm sounded by Jehovah’s witnesses to be false too? The Devil would like to have you believe nothing else. It would be folly for a fire department not to respond to an alarm just because the previous forty or fifty warnings were false alarms. This one might not be. Every alarm must be investigated to ensure security. Likewise, it would be folly for people of good will at the present time to ignore the intensified warning of Jehovah’s witnesses, simply because some Bible believers of the past have sounded false alarms.



    Some may sincerely inquire, Why were early Bible scholars misled into thinking Christ was to return in their day, especially so since the Bible is very specific as to the time and manner of his presence? The answer to the question is that those scholars erroneously concluded that Christ’s second presence was to be visible, "or a silent, gradual penetration of all social forces by his spirit, to be either perpetual or continued until the consummation." And too, those scholars did not take under consideration that all the events prophesied by Jesus had to be fulfilled within the generation of his coming.

    For example: The troublesome times of A.D. 66-70 were seized upon by some and interpreted as signs of the approaching end. After the destruction of Jerusalem Christ was sure to make his appearance. But the civil strife between the Jews and the Romans did not constitute the sign of Jesus’ presence, nor did the famines and pestilences that followed. There were no world wars then, no unusual number of earthquakes, nor was the good news of God’s kingdom preached in all the inhabited earth. In fact, it had much to cover yet of the European continent.

    The early expectations of Christ’s return during the second, third and fourth centuries turned out to be false alarms. The so-called EpistleofBarnabas, according to the Didaché (a Christian manual of the second century), represents "the last day as at hand, when the present world along with the evil one shall be destroyed by the returning Lord. Almost 6,000 years are thought to have elapsed since creation. . . . The seventh day of 1,000 years is about to begin with the Second Advent." Irenaeus supports Barnabas, "placing the end of the world and the return of Christ 6,000 years after creation."Lactantius agrees with them and believes that "at most the present world cannot endure beyond another 200 years, and the end is to be expected daily." Tertullian predicted the decline of the Roman empire, the rise of the antichrist, and felt himself living in the ‘last time.’ Hippolytus fixed the day for the return of Christ 500 years after Christ’s birth. And there were a host of others, Commodian, Methodius of Olympus in Lycia, Victorinus of Pettau, and the Egyptian bishop Nepos, all of whom made wild predictions of Christ’s return.

    Their prognostications were totally unfounded in the light of the Scriptures; therefore, all without exception proved false. The physical facts were not present in their entirety to fulfill Jesus’ prophecies concerning his second presence, nor were their chronological tables accurate. Some of their dates were off as much as a thousand years. Hippolytus’ 500-year date was not based on the Scriptures, but was a guess that proved wrong.

    As was to be expected after these false alarms, and no doubt as the Devil planned it, the teaching of Christ’s return became very unpopular. People viewed with cynicism and skepticism anyone who dared even to mention the doctrine. The book of Revelation was rejected and called the work of the heretic Cerinthus. New theories were introduced and popularized. Origen argued against a literalistic appearing of Christ. He taught that Christ’s return takes place through the power of the gospel; that the world would not be destroyed but that it would be transformed by the preaching of Christianity.

    Another theory that remained popular for a time was that set forth by Donatist Ticonius, who explains in his commentary on Revelation that Christ would not come until the Donatist Church established itself in the world, and was sufficiently strong to resist paganism and the false religion of Catholicism. Both of these theories are false for Scriptural reasons, namely: The purpose of Christianity is not to convert this present evil world, nor will gospel-preaching transform it. This evil world has been condemned by God to destruction, and no man or man-made organization will save it. (Dan. 2:44) God has purposed a new-world government for mankind wherein righteousness is to dwell. (2 Pet. 3:13) The gospel is preached for "a witness to all the nations," that people of good will may flee to the Kingdom before the day of Armageddon. (Matt. 24:14, NW) Ticonius’ theory is also false, because the return of Christ is not dependent upon the achievements of men, nor upon the establishment of a church group or body, but rests solely upon the spirit and power of Almighty God Jehovah.—Ps. 110:1, 2.

    Augustine of the Catholic Church dismissed the whole idea that Christ was yet to come by saying the Kingdom was established at Christ’s first coming; that Christ at his first coming bound Satan the Devil and began ruling then and there. Augustine maintained that Christ’s coming occurs continually in his church, "that is, in His members, in which he comes little by little and piece by piece, since the whole Church is His body." Augustine further believed that the millennial reign of Christ would close about A.D. 1000, and that at that time the final coming of Christ to judge might be expected.

    As A.D. 1000 approached, many religious folk began to think that the judgment and fiery end of the world would occur that year. Excitement became widespread throughout western Europe because it was feared that God’s "day of wrath" was at hand. When the world did not burn up that year, the religionists felt it was proof that the thousand years of Revelation 20:2 were not literal but an indefinite period of time, and that the Catholic Church, being the so-called "Mother" church, was already reigning in it. That view obtains among the Roman Catholic Hierarchy to this day.



    Following Augustine’s time the aggressions of the Saracens, the Crusades, the rise of the monastic orders during the thirteenth century, also the topsy-turvy world of the fourteenth century, all were misinterpreted as "signs" foretelling the imminent return of Christ. Joachin of Floris determined that the 1,260 days mentioned in Revelation 12:6 could turn out to be the year A.D. 1260 when Christ would return. Militz of Kromeriz, a forerunner of John Huss, looked for the coming of Christ between the years 1365 and 1367.Wycliffe pointed to the power of the papacy and emphasized that the time of the return was at hand. John Napier predicted the coming end of evil and the return of Christ between the years 1688 and 1700. William Whiston first selected 1715, then 1734, and later 1866 as the date for the inauguration of the millennium.

    In the early part of the nineteenth century Christoph Hoffman hurried from Germany to Jerusalem to rebuild the temple in preparation for Christ’s early return. William Miller predicted that Christ would make his appearance during the year 1843, but later postponed the day to October 22, 1844. When these speculations did not materialize, religious sects became a laughingstock, great divisions took place among them, the doctrine was scoffed at, the people who taught it were jeered, and as a whole the idea was pooh-poohed in religious and nonreligious circles alike. All, without exception, were false alarms.

    With the coming of the twentieth century a new flurry of alarms was sounded. "Prepare to Die! Be Ready at All Hours! The End of the World Is at Hand!" read posters during an Adventist convention in Paris, August 20, 1927. The Adventists believed that the return of Christ would mean the consuming of the earth with fire. The righteous would be saved by being taken to heaven. Even before that, when World War I was reaching a climax a manifesto was issued by a number of England’s most noted ministers. This manifesto said, among other things, "that the present crisis points towards the close of the times of the Gentiles. Second. That the revelation of the Lord may be expected at any moment, when he will be manifested as evidently as to His disciples on the evening of His resurrection. Third. That the completed church will be translated to be ‘for ever with the Lord’." This manifesto was signed by leading Baptist, Congregationalist, Presbyterian, Episcopalian and Methodist ministers.

    They inaccurately calculated the times of the Gentiles, because these had had their end in the fall of 1914. True to Jesus’ prophecy, world war did break out. Famines, pestilences and earthquakes followed. Christians were persecuted and murdered. The news of the established kingdom of God began to be preached. Anxiety and fear have gripped the world. Lawlessness and delinquency are on the increase. Nations have banded together, first in the League of Nations and now in the United Nations. And this political makeshift government is being hailed, even as the League of Nations was hailed as the only hope for peace and as the "political expression of the kingdom of God." All of these events are precisely what Jesus foretold would mark his presence.

    Why, then, did he not appear? He did appear, not as a man in the flesh, but by a manifestation of his presence through these events that occurred in the fulfillment of his prophecies. He never did promise that he would make his second appearance in the flesh, visible to the human eye. In fact, he told his disciples that "a little longer and the world will behold me no more." (John 14:19, NW) If he were to make his second appearance in the flesh, would there be any reason for him to go into great length describing the conditions on earth at the time of his appearance? Of course not. Why give them a composite sign, if they were to see him with their naked eye? Knowing that his return would be observed only through circumstantial evidence, the disciples requested a sign. The sign Jesus gave was a long list of events that would occur on the earth at the time when he would come into his kingdom power in the heavens and would begin his reign.

    These events began to occur on earth in the year 1914, and continue to assert themselves to the present day. Not just one or two of these momentous happenings have come upon this generation, but all of them. NO FALSE ALARM THIS!

    How have religious clergymen responded to the alarm? They have turned a deaf ear to it. Not being able to see Christ in the flesh they have become perplexed. RadioTimes for December, 1950, stated that "many preachers have an uneasy feeling that they ought to speak about the Second Coming of Christ: but they are so perplexed about it that they tend to avoid the issue." "Rev." Dr. George Hedley of Mills College reflected the view held by many clergymen today. Said he: "When will the Christ come again? When the spirit of God enters human hearts. How shall we recognize his coming? By realizing the divine life within ourselves. Is the Christ coming again? He is, if we will let him come. He will come to us this morning if we but choose."

    Much to the contrary, the coming of Christ is not dependent upon any individual. He is here, now, ruling as King from heaven in the midst of his enemies! (Ps. 110:1, 2) World events prove it. The alarm being sounded by Jehovah’s witnesses is genuine, true. Do not let the negative, irresponsive and indifferent attitude of the world lull you to sleep. Respond to the alarm. Flee now to the mountains of Jehovah’s system of things. Do not delay. You will find protection there from the fire of Armageddon. Armageddon survivors will testify to the fact that THIS WAS NO FALSE ALARM!

  • bigmouth

    Along the same lines as Gophers thought....we've had the Org. saying the preaching work is completed 20 years ago and they're saying it is completed now, yet the act of preaching continues.

    Somehow they try to re-define the accepted meaning of words.

  • seek2find

    The reason I felt that this paticular article was deceptive was because It used the title about Jesus comming that most non witnesses associate with Jesus words at Matt. 24:3 which the NWT translates as "Presence". I just hope some householders ask when the magazine is offered to them something like this. "Oh, I thought Jehovah's Witnesses thought Jesus returned in 1914" And then ask the publisher to explain. This could turn out as confusing in some minds as the Article in yesterdays Watchtower Study about the first resurection. Somehow I don't beleive Jesus intended the Gospel message to be near this confusing. seek2find

  • IsaacJS2

    They could just be trying to peek the curiosity of other fundamentalist Christians who have a different understanding of Christ's return. They are asking the question, and the people in the picture are looking and waiting as many Christians are doing now. I assume the article plans to set them "straight" on the question it has have raised. I've seen other covers like that before.

    I think they're just trying to get the attention of other believers so they'll read the magazine.


  • bigmouth

    I think you're right Isaac. They're using familiar terminology so that when you read the article they can tell you why you're wrong.

  • Alligator Wisdom
    Alligator Wisdom

    If you have the copy of this issue, notice the expression of the young black boy in the upper right hand corner.

    It looks as if he isn't ready and is very scared of Christ's coming.

    Alligator Wisdom (aka Brother NOT Exerting Vigorously by WTS standards)

  • NewYork44M

    Witnesses believe in a coming of Christ. This "coming" occurs after his presence. Now figure that one out. If you do, let me know. I was never able to understand the logic in this belief.

  • AK - Jeff
    AK - Jeff

    I think they're just trying to get the attention of other believers so they'll read the magazine.


    Yep - me too. They do it every November/December with the Watchtower featuring Jesus and the Christmas season somehow - bait and switch.


  • Fatfreek

    I think they are referring to the antitypical antitype of the past tense "coming" from the perspective of the future "coming".

    Great doublespeak, Elsewhere. Therefore, I think the future site of our next Dallas fest is in good hands. Is it still on at your complex?


  • heathen

    Are they showing people in the ancient robe atire? or are they wearing todays clothing? The WTBTS already says that you will not see jesus so what would be the point of them making it look as if somebody is? Or is it about holding your head up high because the deliverance is near? Looks like now I gotta get a copy for myself ........................

Share this