you know. you're not as nice as you think and as I thought. I wrote you a whole thing about the Bible's authenticity, and your claim about the Koran, and not once did you address that. about the history, the archeology, hygeine, nothing. instead you just chose to diss me with "indoctrination" insults. real "nice". nice dodge is what that is. ears tickled. I take back about 90% of my apology. the fact is that 95% of the people on this site are in face snakes and wackos. why didn't you read or address that whole thing to you, where I corrected your nonsense about the Bible's authenticity, and the remarks you made about how dismiss someone's words cuz of the source, which is not really true? instead you kiss "PeaceKeepers" butt, who is borderline apostate anyway, and diss me?? typical. again, if I was going off with similar tones BUT IN OPPOSITION TO JWs AND THE WATCHTOWER, you would not be giving me flack. so that makes you very hypocritical. it's very selective. I'm blunt and to the point. on this site full of warped rebellious vipers. not with regular people. and thin-skinned types can't take it. also, PeaceKeeper. blow it out your nose. I'm tired of the sissified over-sensitve whining already. you're not a real witness, but a borderline Judas. otherwise you would not be kissing the butts of actual apostates and criticizing the WT's stance on things so much, and on this site to get yours ears tickled about it.
and don't give me this gas about "indoctrination" and whatever, cuz again, if I was coming off the same exact way, but only in opposition the JWs, you'd be either applauding it or at the very least not giving flack about it. so it's double triple and quadruple standards inconsistency and hypocrisy. you'll whine and harp about "tones" and "sarcasm" and "name-calling" and not focus on harsh real disturbing POINTS AND ISSUES. and to Piece, it was not just Christ that called people like you and apostates and religious hypocrites "fools and vipers" but also Stephen and Paul. Could they "read men's hearts" too??
so your constant harping on that is just a convenient dodge. at least my dialog with AuldSoul, though in general disagreement, has been half-way civil an decent. pointed and blunt, but civil. so it all depends. I had another guy ask me about birthday celebrations, and I told him, and he appreciated it and that was that. he didn't whine about my tone like so many others are. he just looked at my points and considered them and that was that. again, to seattle nit, you have the nerve to diss me when I was responding to you sincerely about the Bible authenticity issue, and sent that specifically to you, with no harsh tones or anything in that message? then you wonder why I'm telling you off now? I'm sure you'll whine like a cry baby about that too. summarily dismissing the actual points made with the other message. why? cuz you already have this venomous thing against Witnesses to start with. so you'll see imperfections that are either not there, or if they're there, you'll exaggerate them and harp on them like crazy. to the exclusion of everything else.