Posts by fastJehu

so a user named "the-question" said the jw's were right about 607 bce.. this is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.. we all can't wait to hear from you :).

fastJehu

Hoffnung
and the city of Babylon was eventually destroyed more than 1000 years ago
and has not been rebuilt until today. and nobody is living there.
not that i care now, but also in this the bible was right.

Nobody?

Saddam Hussein rebuild the palace of Nebuchadnezzar.

You can have a close look via google maps into this region - how it looks like today:

https://www.google.de/maps/place/Hilla,+Irak/@32.5449273,44.4157196,6858m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x1558e2ff01db52b9:0xa59de3214124678b!8m2!3d32.4773359!4d44.4276206

Here are a german report about Babylon today:

http://www.zeit.de/2009/31/A-Babylon

45

New light in this weeks WT?

by Indian Larry in

anybody have any ideas where they are going with the "new light" they have been pushing last week and this week?

for instance in this weeks study article one section reads:.

in years gone by, we believed that jehovah became displeased with his people because they did not have a zealous share in the preaching work during world war i. we concluded that for this reason, jehovah allowed babylon the great to take them captive for a short time.

fastJehu

Anders Andersen
How is it even possible that they get new information about their own history, especially now that everyone who actually had first hand experience is dead?

Page 27 § 5:

... However, faithful brothers and sisters who served God during the 1914-1918 period later made it clear that as a whole the Lord’s people did everything they could to keep the preaching work going. There is strong evidence to support this testimony. A more accurate understanding of our theocratic history has led to a clearer comprehension of certain events recorded in the Bible.

later... has been WHEN???

strong evidence... WHERE can I find this strong evidence?

For me it's wishy-washy.

45

New light in this weeks WT?

by Indian Larry in

anybody have any ideas where they are going with the "new light" they have been pushing last week and this week?

for instance in this weeks study article one section reads:.

in years gone by, we believed that jehovah became displeased with his people because they did not have a zealous share in the preaching work during world war i. we concluded that for this reason, jehovah allowed babylon the great to take them captive for a short time.

fastJehu

Indian Larry
The thing is that I no longer have the WT Library on CD, actually I no longer have a Windows computer period. I have gone all Mac so I cant research like I used to.

Here you can download a software, to install the normal WT library on your mac:

http://www.wtlibrary.net/en/

My mac has the WT-library installed since years with this tool.

Here the BOE-Letter about the library 2016 (source = user darkspilver):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwqmWMK7dwtlRGxFNXFld3NYcFE/view

Here the library 2016 CD for download (source = http://avoidjw.org):

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bw0qjUoEReBVMmFGY1h6Q3hMSjA

63

Is it possible to decline preaching in the carts?

by Skepsis in

jw
friends

hi folks,.

i have a difficult dilemma.

since i'm not pioneering any more, i'm reducing my hours wasted at that artifact known as cart or trolley.

fastJehu

Skepsis
Some elders are never in the cart since they work all the week and those who are on the list don't like it and don't want to increase their hours...

Follow the really good example of this spirituality elders and find a fulltime job.

36

How do JW's determine a person is anointed?

by thinker11 in

i've always wondered about this.

when a person believes they made a spiritual connection with god and proclaims themselves as anointed, how do they determine whether this person is anointed or not.

does a group of elders look at the person's spiritual resume and check off the person's pioneer stats, bible knowledge, attendance, work ethic, personality, etc and then believe in the person if they have a good track record?

fastJehu

blondie
Actually, there was a Questions from Readers 6-15-96 WT issue p. 31 on that that said the WTS said it was equal.

And they repeated it in this WT:

*** w16 January pp. 23-24 par. 6 “We Want to Go With You” ***
Modestly, anointed ones acknowledge that they do not necessarily have more holy spirit than those with an earthly hope. They do not claim to have special knowledge or revelations; neither do they try to prove that they are in some way superior. They would also never suggest to others that these too have been anointed and should start partaking; rather, they would humbly acknowledge that it is Jehovah who does the calling of anointed ones.

161

ARC Analysis Summary of Case Files

by Richard Oliver in

i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.

i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.

it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.

fastJehu

Richard Oliver

I do believe that in some jurisdictions where it requires elders to report the matter, the must and should. In jurisdictions where it gives the option to report or not, they should encourage the family to report and if they choose not to report, then the elders should report.

So last year there was a letter to all BOE, that EVERY Damage to property and burglary (at kingdomhalls) should be reportet immediately to the police.

Why not such a letter because of a much worse crime???

It's a CRIME - not "only a sin" - and every crime has to be reported.
That should be the WT policy.

fastJehu

Posts by fastJehu

Richard OliverI do believe that in some jurisdictions where it requires elders to report the matter, the must and should. In jurisdictions where it gives the option to report or not, they should encourage the family to report and if they choose not to report, then the elders should report.

Richard Oliver

I do believe that in some jurisdictions where it requires elders to report the matter, the must and should. In jurisdictions where it gives the option to report or not, they should encourage the family to report and if they choose not to report, then the elders should report.