I am beginning to see that Logic only has value if it indeed agrees with the "logic" of the person you are talking to in threads such as these.
"I think I made that clear - I think Obama made a choice to put himself in the issue and YES I think that's slimy. I would think the same thing of anyone doing it."
" So now you get pissed that I make an opinion after YOU called me aliar"
I'm not pissed - you sound like you are the one pissed.
" I just can't be bothered with dealing with your prejudice or your racism or your hate. I don't get it. You attack and continue to attack and don't stop. "
But sammie I am not the one that called the president of your country a slime ball(sounds like hate to me), I am not the one that called Trayvon Martin a Thug, I am not the one that said Trayvon got what he deserved, I am not the one that said just because he is 17 doesn't make him a child, I am not the one that says it is only right to be afraid of black men that wear hoodies and are tall and muscular. Those things are stated by you and your think tank. You claim I am attacking but you are responding as much as anyone else posting news articles from biased sources and calling others prejudiced and racist and full of hate. (see your comments above)
So how do you figure that the president is swaying people in to rioting when he specifically spoke out against rioting? So should he have told the people to riot in an attempt to not get them to riot?
Your buddies were the ones over-stating TM size and Stature to prove something yet you never called them on it. THat is the problem. You don't care about facts from everyone just those who disagree with you. (Hard to accept but it's true)