Amazing,
Seeker: Is it possible maybe too much is being read into Bush's intent. What does it mean to make a society modern? To me, that does not mean changing their culture. Rather, it means working with them so that they can shed ignorance and bigotry against us as they expect us to shed ignorance and bigotry toward them. It means meeting basic human needs. Most importantly, developing relationships with them so that they won't breed terrorists who want to kill us
High-minded ideals, to be sure. It would be nice if this were the intent, but the past history of American dealings with other countries doesn't give us much room for hope that this is what they mean. Some of the bigotry against America is out of ignorance and propaganda. Some of it is due to the way America has selfishly meddled in the affairs of other countries. I'm sure people in Central America heard that part of the speech last night and shuddered, for they have suffered at the hands of America as America has imposed its will on who gets to lead those countries.
There is also the question of cultural bias. Who is to say the modern way is always the best way? Yes, advances in science are good, and the like, but is the industrial revolution always an improvement over an agrarian society? Is an urban-centralized life an improvement over rural living? If the definition of "modern" is hosting Nike factories where children can be exploited with 14-hour days and few bathroom breaks, some countries may choose to opt out.
If a country comes to us and says, 'Please help us modernize,' then America should do so.
If a country says, 'We're fine the way we are, thanks,' then America should respect that too.
I've noticed a number of comments about Afghanistan in this thread. Bush wasn't talking just about Afghanistan in that part of the speech. Economic good times requires ever-increasing markets, and the only way that globalization works is if everyone comes to the party. Not every nation will want to come to the party if America gets to set all the rules.