(c) pinterest.
no end in sight! sigh!
horse racing lengths vary from just a couple of furlongs to several hundred miles, if you count the mongolian derby.
in britain, horse racing rules state that races should be over a minimum of five furlongs, while the longest race is over 4m2½f.. .
nascar races generally last anywhere from 1.5 to 4 hours, depending on the length of the race, number of laps and track conditions.
(c) pinterest.
no end in sight! sigh!
horse racing lengths vary from just a couple of furlongs to several hundred miles, if you count the mongolian derby.
in britain, horse racing rules state that races should be over a minimum of five furlongs, while the longest race is over 4m2½f.. .
nascar races generally last anywhere from 1.5 to 4 hours, depending on the length of the race, number of laps and track conditions.
, no, the finish line is not in sight, because
The end is "just around the corner" , therefore out of sight, because there is no transparency. unless
you use a mirror, -----,the wt smoke & mirror. or
The really funnny wt glasses shown here some years ago. If somebody could find and post, to give us the belly chuckle.
I like to hear seamless confirmation about the reading first. but
Calling members "publishers" made them kind of personally responsible too.
That is why i am ashamed to have published the wt stuff 2/3s of my life*. compared to Jesus only 10% of his time.
Walmart announcement: ask any associate for assistance.
* on second thought that figure is wrong, I use wt material now only to debunk the j--- P. S. wt writers already use the term "associate", when they call a jw who has terminated his membership ( by voting for trump/biden for example) as "disassociated"
i gotta say, i don't know much about the solar system.
i never was particularly interested in it.. but i've recently read professor brian cox's book (which accompanies a bbc series) and it's completely fascinating.. i'm quite interested in pictures of mars.
martian landscapes seem familiar and different at the same time ….
Neptune always sits there as a big fat gassy giant spoiler. mathematical coincidence with a degree of fudge rather than an actual law.
BT right. certainly not a universal law. not observed in any of the exo planet systems so far.
Neptune's position exactly between Uranus and Pluto at 9,6 AU for the establishing of a lower 3 and upper 96 limit to the geometric progression of the Bode sequence.
( the innermost and outermost planets are equisistant).
Bode / Titius is a 9 place coincidence, ? is the universe old enough to allow for that? lucky us,
. because stability is made from resonances like that.
Think of the planet spacings as wavelengths, the ecliptic as a Chladni plate.
7 octaves like on a piano.
it was stated many years ago in answer to how did the flood cover the top of all the mountains on earth in noah`s day.?.
mount everest ?.
and it was explained away by saying that the mountains before the flood were a lot smaller / lower than the mountains that exist today.. so there was no problem .. when the deluge began with so much volume of water now covering the earth ( water being heavy ) pushed down into the weakest parts of the earth and raised up in other parts of the earth to where we now have higher mountains than existed before the flood of noah`s day.. in other words mount everest didn`t exist at its present height before the flood and neither did any other high mountain that exists today ,the topography all changed with the noachian flood.
peer review can be flawed because peers have axes to grind, the "not invented here" factor. but science itself is not flawed, because of the only temporarily true answers, but is great, because it gives rise to better questions. so: back to the OP:
is mount Everest taller now than it was "before the deluge"? ? ? Yes: 20 meters estimated.
i gotta say, i don't know much about the solar system.
i never was particularly interested in it.. but i've recently read professor brian cox's book (which accompanies a bbc series) and it's completely fascinating.. i'm quite interested in pictures of mars.
martian landscapes seem familiar and different at the same time ….
doesn't it make you stop to wonder---what
t: makes you wonder how is it that the possible creator of that immensity is pictured in the bible as walking in the garden in the breezy paty of the day, bellyaching because of--.
Wt believers totally and I mean absolutely underestimate the stature of such a being. or:
has the solar system, the universe created itself? even energy, out of which the universe was made, can not be created. or destroyed.
i gotta say, i don't know much about the solar system.
i never was particularly interested in it.. but i've recently read professor brian cox's book (which accompanies a bbc series) and it's completely fascinating.. i'm quite interested in pictures of mars.
martian landscapes seem familiar and different at the same time ….
Yes, Pluto will always be the ninth planet to me.
BT: and to the hidden one who sneakily might be setting all this up. because
Pluto is the only body occupying the 388 position in the Bode doubling sequence.* nailing that " hole in one " scenario.
Neptune is not, bsw.
* 4, 7, 10, 16, 28, 52, 100, 196, 388.
Planetary orbit distances (between semi major axes) in AU:
Venus to Earth +.3; Earth (1. 0) 100% accuracy of course
to Mars 2x.3 +.6; 5% accuracy
to asteroids +1.2;
to Jupiter +2.4; with .003% accuracy !!! 80% of planetary mass.
to Saturn(100) +4.8;
to Uranus (19. 6) + 9.6;
to Pluto +2x9.6 or +19.2 AU results in 38.8 with 2 %accuracy
Pluto's place is prominent. provisionally permanent.
i gotta say, i don't know much about the solar system.
i never was particularly interested in it.. but i've recently read professor brian cox's book (which accompanies a bbc series) and it's completely fascinating.. i'm quite interested in pictures of mars.
martian landscapes seem familiar and different at the same time ….
LUHE: Mercury has a nighttime temperature of MINUS 290 F or -180 degr. centigrade.
Venus' slow retrograde rotation helps the roasting too. She turns like the truly original planetary gear. or ball in a ball bearing.
The solar system is a ball game. 9+ holes in one.
i gotta say, i don't know much about the solar system.
i never was particularly interested in it.. but i've recently read professor brian cox's book (which accompanies a bbc series) and it's completely fascinating.. i'm quite interested in pictures of mars.
martian landscapes seem familiar and different at the same time ….
Our solar system has an unique architecture, seen in the stacking of the planets, their rotation and orbital velocities.
outstanding is No. 1, the first body where live is discovered: "our" Earth.
No.10 in the Bode* series. with an orbital velocity 10 000 times the speed of light. An orbital diameter of 1000 seconds, a pendulum 10 decimeters long, that swings in a one second, a surface acceleration of ~ 10 m/s^2. A surface atmospheric pressure equal to a 10 meter water column. using a 10 based counting system because of the No.of digits of its dominant species.
* a doubling in planetary distances with a lower limit of .3 AU, upper of 9.6 AU.
here is a screenshot from a video on jw.org.
go to videos, our organization, history .
jehovah's witnesses—faith in action, part 1: out of darkness.
next this scene can be remastered to show Noah's family in the house to house work, preaching righteousness, with the ark half finished in the far background. Not using scroll rolls bat wooden, clay tablets.