can someone please help me find the video from the society regarding not advancing children's talents?
it's about a child who is very good at something musical and has been invited to participate in a special advanced course but his father explains how that is worldly thinking.
something along those lines..
How will the youths, whose talent is not appreciated and furthered react?
In one case of celebrating the departure of the leaving CO* , they declined to perform, even though on the printed schedule.
* departure is always a cause to celebrate, like the speaker leaving the podium is a reason to applaud. loudly.
jws and other christians would often point to the handful of the bible verses that seem to be scientifically accurate as evidence of its divine inspiration.
but not surprisingly, they ignore the ones that are scientifically inaccurate, or when they address those verses they put a spin on it like saying the account is not a reflection of what the bible is teaching but what men at the time erroneously believed and which god allowed them to record in the bible.
would you believe a jw actually told me that!
For exemple Job 26:7 Suspending the earth upon nothing.
kein lesard: think relativistically: considering the equivalence of energy and matter, that biblical statement is not totally correct either.
The Earth is held against gravity by the energy of its orbital motion, resulting in the centrifugal force away from the Sun, balancing that pull for the last few billion years.
energy is not nothing, There is enough energy in one gram of matter to really spoil your day. energy matters, it is not with nothing that we are still up here 150 million km above.
added: interestingly, without that velocity, visually, we would be not falling, but rising up toward the sun, since we see our star only above the horizon.
on the alex jones radio program (yes we get it here via emails) just recently he highlighted that president trump has cleared the way fro action against paedophiles.
i was unable to cut and past the item.. two things here.
cut and paste please.
wt better be squeaky clean, with Warwick so close to the NY/ NJ state line.
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
what snake oil are you guys selling
no, poking fun at the talking snake story is more fun than having to dissect MacBeth in high school.
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
the statements had no connection to reality. they did not die the day they touched or ate, nearly 1000 years later is kind of late ? right? and do not quote peter please.
i bleed for the poor souls caught in that.
no sprinkler system in that domestic building..!.
tragically the govts various of london learned nothing during the world war..
SF:...fire-lighter material protected by aluminium foil.'--" up and onto the exterior cladding, which was unfortunately constructed with a flammable polyethylene inner layer. F:
interesting. hopefully with the source and spread of the fire at the perimeter, many eventually kept their windows closed and escaped to the cool inner core, down the staircase. hopefully none clung to the windows where the heat was, and were somehow warned to seek the central way down.
a couple of months ago this crazy gb member via video gave a talk about their would be princes in the new order but no princesses.
i thought that was so funny.
especially after he beated around the bush the whole talk, finally saying in the last sentence their would be princes but no princesses in the new system,then the video just blacked out.
any aspiring to royalty among the sisters are urged to start partaking at the Memorial now. . Rulers will be in heaven. canneiving jezebels hiding among the OS of the GC after the GT? why not, alive and well now in all congregations!
i bleed for the poor souls caught in that.
no sprinkler system in that domestic building..!.
tragically the govts various of london learned nothing during the world war..
Any person or organisation shown to be responsible should face criminal charges. Luhe:
it might not be criminal, but economics. The cladding had an airspace and toxic plastic to burn, but that airspace is code to prevent mold. but also creating this chimney effect. depleting oxygen in the building, toxic, nasty killing fumes.
Is it better to pave over England to give all the comers a separate ground level unit? where is Prince Phillip when we need him with a bon mot?
so he tries to prove that we are living in the last days without any evidence, but instead a series of unsubstantiated assertions ("never has there been a time with so much lack love and affection").
and uses things that are not even part of the so-called "sign" (abortions, pollution).
then proceeds to ridicule the "ridiculers," stereotype them, and declare they are only fit for destruction!.
He talks about abortion and the lack of natural affection but how many thousands have they talked into not having children, smothering their natural human inclinations?
Listener: good point! that is why his name is appropriate "mal-enfant". = bad [for] children, unless you get a cross for having 8 by Putin. tres mal.
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
What was said about the *tree* previously, before Mr. snake eye showed up
not to touch it. a sure invitation to do so.
