An elder got up and called my wife a stain in the congregation right in front of me.
Real humble
that is a question i want to calmly and politely ask a witness next time i interact with them.
perhaps at a cart.. "the bible says we should be humble.
may i ask, are you humble enough to admit you were wrong on things you believe?
An elder got up and called my wife a stain in the congregation right in front of me.
Real humble
i am looking for someone to please clear this up.
there are scriptures like in the 1 corinthians chapter 5 that refer to jesus as “our lord jesus”.
the lord is jehovah, why does that scripture in 1 corinthians refer to the lord as jesus?
The general idea is when god revealed himself in the old testament, people were actually seeing and communicating with Jesus Christ.
The term LORD or Jehovah becomes somewhat ambiguous between Jesus and his father because of that fact.
hi all,i have been studying with the witnesses for more than 6 months and regularly attend both midweek & weekend meetings, and i am nearly at the end of the "bible teach" book.
my boss is adamant i attend team christmas functions.
she knows about my studying and potential baptism next year, and has suggested that i attend and just not participate in activities like kris kringle.
you do realize the entire religion is a belief that Jesus only died for anointed Christians who are solely represented by seven men in New York City. though your works and obidence to seven men in New York, that is your salvation.
basically the entire new testament isn't for you. just to be clear
If you know about the history of doctrinal flip flops, the altered new world translation and what real bible scholars think about new world translation you don't need to worry about your relationship with God.
you don't have one.
you are just a lonely idiot in a club.
i believe the gb's takeover of the fds was an illegal coup - not illegal relative to the laws of land, but illegal according to jw "laws" or doctrine.. according to jw doctrine, the fds is god's channel of communication between heaven and earth.
before the coup, the fds was defined to be all the anointed on earth, and the gb was part of that group and merely the spokesman for the group - individual gb members having no more authority than non-gb members of the fds.. however, a few years ago, the gb, independently of the other members of the fds, decided that it alone was the fds.
that, to me, was an illegal overthrow of the body (fds); it was a coup.. suppose the u.s. president decided that he has all power, and that he removed the powers of the u.s. congress.
I remember being in a tuesday night meeting and they were doing a householder example , explaining how they were not a cult.
They said cults were ran by a single person or a small number of people. Jehovah witnesses are lead by Jehovah god and his annoited remnet on earth.
I almost busted out laughing. We all know it is lead by a religious junta of seven men.
The new understanding to me is basically like they just got sick of explaining of what the 10000 or so heavenly hopers actually do in the Borg.
It's like they finally said " fuck it", everyone already knows we are a cult anyway.
i have been reading this book called " the two powers in heaven " .. the readers digest version is basically there was a first century belief of kind of a dual god system in the old testament.
god is invisible and yet he appears at the " word of the lord " or " the angel of the lord ".
basically any time god was visible and dealing with humans in a touchable , see able manner , it was though to be christ.
the question is do new testament writers think of Jesus as a central figure from the old testament?
I really believe they do?
i have been reading this book called " the two powers in heaven " .. the readers digest version is basically there was a first century belief of kind of a dual god system in the old testament.
god is invisible and yet he appears at the " word of the lord " or " the angel of the lord ".
basically any time god was visible and dealing with humans in a touchable , see able manner , it was though to be christ.
I have been reading this book called " The two powers in heaven " .
The readers digest version is basically there was a first century belief of kind of a dual god system in the old testament. God is invisible and yet he appears at the " word of the lord " or " the angel of the lord ". Basically any time god was visible and dealing with humans in a touchable , see able manner , it was though to be Christ. Yet the term Jehovah or LORD seems to apply to both figures or at the least there is an ambigious use of the term.
So when you read the new testament , what exactly did New Testament Writers mean by expressions like " visible image of god " or calling Jesus " the word of the lord " , or there was a belief that Jesus lead the Israelis out of Egypt.
I am not trying to argue if the bible is right or wrong or inspired. I just find the more I study , from a theology point of view it seems to teach a common story that isn't even close to what the WTS teaches.
my experience with jws that came to my house started me on a journey of learning the truth about "jehovah's organization".
it didnt take long for me to stump them with bible questions that show what jw org teaches is not biblically accurate.
i hope when i lay on them 6 pages of their history (which will later be a counter-watchtower magazine) the light will come on when they read about pyramids and see photos.
I went to church for years and the kingdom hall for years , never really understanding the bible or even caring too.
I was eventually challenged by someone about the idea of Jesus in the old testament. An idea that I was completely foreign too.
Once doing the research I began to realize new testament writers are thinking of Lord or Jehovah as a two being creature. An invisible omnipresent being an a devine visible being.
Jesus is though of as this second visible being of the old testament in the new testament. It seem rather bizarre how most Christians miss that.
Anywho it strikes me as odd how people don't leave bible schools or theological collages and become Jehovah witnesses. its like they aren't even at step one.
i googled the question "do jehovah's witnesses do charity work?
" and up popped the above website designed to counter virtually all wts criticism.
anyone know about this website?.
I have read a few article and found they are really just opinion masked theology.
when i say we, i just mean my wife.
we moved to a community of maybe 20000. this hall claims to have 160 publishers but i have my doubts.. the most shocking part is there isn't a single child in the hall.
we just moved from a hall with at least 12 kids under 10. watching the people shuffle out this morning made me think it was some dying denominational church.
When I say we, I just mean my wife. We moved to a community of maybe 20000. This hall claims to have 160 publishers but I have my doubts.
The most shocking part is there isn't a single child in the hall. We just moved from a hall with at least 12 kids under 10. Watching the people shuffle out this morning made me think it was some dying denominational church.
Damm they are an old bunch. I kind of laughed.
Meanwhile my mother just told me two young and rather large Syrian refuge families have basically renounced Islam and started to attend her church.
Funny what happens when you offer people basic human needs instead of magazines.
this poor girl was baptized at 9yo.
.
she isnt old enough to buy alcohol, to vote, to decide her own medical treatment, to buy a pet, to travel alone... yet she was deemed old enough to dedicate her life to a religion that will cut her off from her family if she ever leaves.. here she is applauded for shunning her own sister who tried to keep in contact with her after waking up.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yzgnfda8ki.
This is just child abuse.
Social service should just place these children in foster care.