You might not be the owner of said sites then, but you are the same Bob I'm referring to. I understand why you'd want to deny that though. Dont worry, I wont rat you out.. You are right though, we are getting off topic, so to address one of your previous arguments:
The ARC surely did not result in charges being brought against any GB member nor a membership reversal
True. Though it was not the purpose of the Royal Comission to "bring charges" on the GB, or any other religious identity, but rather to inquire into institutional responses to child abuse, report findings and put forth recommendations. It is a strawman argument for you to continue referring to the lack of criminal charges brought forth as some sort of absolvement for the org when it comes to their many mishandlings and subsequent cover ups of child abuse.
The comission's findings confirmed the failures of the org in adequately responding to child abuse in its summary:
"We do not consider the Jehovah’s Witness organisation to be an organisation which responds adequately to child sexual abuse. We do not believe that children are adequately protected from the risk of sexual abuse for the following reasons..."