EasyPrompt:
Thank you for providing the links. However, a 6-year-old unofficial unverified video that was never published to the elders does not form part of a policy. Directives need to be an explicit written letter circulated to all elders who can file it in their CSA records as part of the branch directions. I was referring to such a directive which explicitly asks elders to summarily destroy all CSA documents from the confidential file and which an elder can produce in court when asked.
Regarding the 2020 letter you have posted, the WT has defended its document retention policy:
Mr Frank’s actions are all the more disturbing considering that we have unequivocally explained to the Inquiry the document retention policy of Jehovah’s Witnesses concerning CSA allegations. As stated in our letter dated 25 September 2019, information concerning CSA allegations are marked “Do Not Destroy” and are kept “indefinitely.” This is confirmed in Mr Gillies’ 2 December 2019 witness statement (paras 78-79)
In other words, prior to making his live-stream video allegation, Mr Frank should have been well aware that the Britain Branch Office had not destroyed its CSA records and, instead, had fully disclosed to the Inquiry its CSA records and that Jehovah’s Witnesses were the only religious organisation to have disclosed its CSA records to the Inquiry prior to the opening of the present investigation.