You don't go into sexuality other than very lightly with a child of 8yo. Its not proper to go into too much before they get older. Liberal idiots want to sexualize everything.
mickbobcat
JoinedPosts by mickbobcat
-
51
8 Year Old Can Decide If They Are Transgendered
by minimus inso says joe biden.. anybody agree with this?
?.
-
-
mickbobcat
-
51
8 Year Old Can Decide If They Are Transgendered
by minimus inso says joe biden.. anybody agree with this?
?.
-
-
mickbobcat
Only if one needs to see the wizard to get a brain. Hell not. An 8yo can not enter into a contract or make medical decisions for themselves. The left has lost its mind and went so far down the rabbit hole is not possible IMO for them to ever get back to reality.
-
67
Being Removed From Facebook and Twitter
by minimus ini have a very good friend who has been banned from facebook simply because he makes remarks positive about president trump and negative toward the democratic party.
he has tried to get back on facebook and it appears there is no way for him to return.
people are being removed from social media platforms simply because they have a different political view.
-
-
mickbobcat
There is a new Axis powers. The press, the Democrats and social media. They are the new enemy of the people and to truth. They want to decide what you see hear and can say and even think. Its the ministry of truth and propaganda and you are a thought criminal if you don't think as they do.
-
7
Very good and recent recording of a judicial committee
by StoneWall incame across this today and wished to share it with any that might want to hear.this happened within and over the last few months as you can tell from their references to covid-19 and the precautions they are having to take and you will hear a few dates mentioned as you listen.the first part is good but it gets even better in the second part (final).i'm really impressed with the knowledge this "apostate" has and how well he conducted himself.so much i could say but will let you see for yourself.love to see when others aren't intimidated or humiliated by the so called "loving" brothers on the committee.part 1https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz0tm1mrbfcpart 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i92w4mv5gf0.
-
-
mickbobcat
Its never about asking questions. They say you can ask but will beat you down if you actually try. They are a mind control group and most if not all elders are there because they like the feeling they are special, picked by god, part of a group that is the only ones right and love the admiration giving by the mind numb robots that are the rank and file.
-
7
Very good and recent recording of a judicial committee
by StoneWall incame across this today and wished to share it with any that might want to hear.this happened within and over the last few months as you can tell from their references to covid-19 and the precautions they are having to take and you will hear a few dates mentioned as you listen.the first part is good but it gets even better in the second part (final).i'm really impressed with the knowledge this "apostate" has and how well he conducted himself.so much i could say but will let you see for yourself.love to see when others aren't intimidated or humiliated by the so called "loving" brothers on the committee.part 1https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz0tm1mrbfcpart 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i92w4mv5gf0.
-
-
mickbobcat
Todays JWs are a lot like the leftists today. Take what we say and don't question it.
-
31
Disfellowhipped for not wearing facemask?
by Anna Marina inyup - person has done nothing wrong.
but they have called a judicial and from what i can tell refusing to wear a facemask is bothering them more than the person not turning up.. so is this new light?
if you have been called to a judical please remember to stay safe and wear your personal protective equimpment.
-
-
mickbobcat
This is anecdotal. I doubt there is any truth to it. No one is DFed for a particular action they do it by saying you are showing a non christian attitude. If someone was talked to about a mask and they got extremely defensive and told the elder to F off they would very well be DFed.
-
5
WT Steam Roll Faith Leaks
by Slidin Fast inwt sued faith leaks for reproducing 74 video items.
faith leaks apparently climbed down.
wt must be up there amongst the most litigious religious organisations in the world.. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/jehovahs-witnesses-resolve-copyright-dispute-with-faithleaks.
-
-
mickbobcat
Think of how much damage these sites are doing for the cult to go after them.
-
34
How do you personally deal with your still in family JWS ?
by Finkelstein infor myself i just try to avoid them intentionally maybe see them once every couple of years on average.
they used to be easy going but over the last 10 years or so they got more cult like and distant and i'm really not bothered by that, maybe a bit.
they stick to their own or other members like they are their family so, its makes it unattractive for myself to connect and reach out to them anymore.
-
-
mickbobcat
You can't deal with a JW
-
9
Harry moves to Cali ... and gets woke
by LoveUniHateExams inprince harry and meghan markle, the duke and duchess of sussex, have stepped back from royal duties and moved to an exclusive enclave of california and into a £11 million mansion (i guess they're slumming it, lol).
they have recently made several pod casts, featuring themselves pontificating on a range of subjects - blm, 'structural racism', the environment, etc.. while they're free to make whatever content they wish, it does seem ridiculous.. why should i treat harry or meghan seriously?.
take meghan.
-
-
mickbobcat
How really gives a rats rear end what any of the these retards do any any given day. Really who cares? England is so stupid to even keep this anachronism. Just give the queen a condo and make the palaces tourist attractions. Only the people who read People and the Enquirer actually follow this horse crap.
-
46
The Society and 1975.
by Lost in the fog instumbled upon this article - not that the wt society ever highlighted the date of 1975, but that was brothers running ahead... .
w68 8/15 pp.
494-501. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1968602#h=1:0 .
-
-
mickbobcat
Personally I don't believe for a min, that the society did not believe or knew they were wrong on the dates set. If it was a pure Joel Osteen scam they would have set the dates past their sell by dates. they did not. In many cases it was only a few years in the future. Franze and Russell I think were total believers in their own ideology. Rutherford I believe also believed in his 1925 dates. It just makes no sense to put the dates so close and know its gong to fail. I believe that this is a good example of the leaders drinking the same koolaid they are giving the rank and file.