BTW everyone knows the Trinity doctrine is not explicitly formulated in the NT writings. It's a red herring to assert as much. The trinity doctrine was formalized in the years immediately following, perhaps even before, the traditional close of the NT IN RESPONSE to the strongly indicative expressions in the NT and maturing oral tradition. There is no intellectually honest way to miss the explicit expressions of such a high Christology in the NT (Word is God, fullness of deity in bodily form, forgive sins, baptize in name of... etc) nor the repeated personification and equivalence of the HS with God. As JWs, we saw a conspiracy afoot because we saw the very next generation of Christians as apostate. In truth. as Riley mentioned, the foundational concepts of God having emanations in some respects acting independent from himself was a part of the Jewish tradition before the time Christians adopted it. There was no conspiracy, only some readers emphasizing some passages while other emphasized others, all convinced they were rightly interpreting. The writings themselves invited this. Christian obsession with mysteries and revelation reveled in it.
Further, a fundamental error in reading the varied writings of the Bible is to presume some singular belief about God or anything else. Despite the writings having been redacted and somewhat harmonized they still display a wide variety of convictions. It's hard to overstate the influence the WT had on our reading of the Bible.