Knowledge or "to know" is explain by one writer as -
Knowledge is empirical verification of what is...
For the Perennial philosophy 'knowing' is the ontological primitive. By reduction it would be the foundation of your being and as such cannot be explained by reference to anything else.
By definition, we know very little in comparison to what we believe whether or not that belief is based on supporting evidence.
It is one thing to say "There is a god." It is an even more profound statement requiring greater proof to state "That god is a person." It is an even greater statement requiring even more profound proof to state "That personal god is the creator." From there even greater to state "That god is the god <insert name>." Finally, the greatest to state "God <insert name> only accept religion <insert name> as the one, true religion."
I do not believe there is sufficient evidence to support that there:
- is a personal god
- with a name
- who created everything
- who wants to be worshipped
- and that worship must come in the specific form of a particular religion.
I do believe that there may be something beyond my human comprehension that fits a very general description of what some might call a "god".