There may be a reasonable explanation for adding votes for one candidate all at once.
OK. What? In the U.S. the ballots can't be separated into parties, as it is in the UK. The ballot contains a vote for many different races, and it is possible to vote for different parties for different races.
Here is one explanation:
The jump in voters in Michigan was due to a simple technical glitch:
https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/11/4/21549710/biden-michigan-votes-trump-retweet-election-map
Trump by a significant margin, it is as simple as that.
A typo? So is this article saying that the news organizations are getting update files from the state, and that in the process of creating the file, there was a "typo" - as in someone finger-flubbed? As in... there is a human feeding these numbers? A human.... in the state government...
Or are they saying a computer dumped out a "0" into an automatically generated file? That is almost worse - because it implies some manual intervention into the computer systems generating the numbers. If the DB that is aggregating votes has votes for Trump, it won't dump "0". And if it is a bug, then the bug would happen more often.
If that is the explanation: OK, then recount.
Here's proof of fraud: they are not allowing observers in to watch the process, despite court orders.
Also, when inner city black districts suddenly have higher turnout for Biden than they had for Obama. And at the same time, comparable black districts in other non-contested cities have a Biden turnout much lower than Obama.