Do we not understand that the ruling as Priest and king is future? in the heavens?
No. It is a misunderstanding that Christ does not return in the flesh. Christ rules with the elect for 1000 years on the earth!
There are several scriptures that confirm this, but one is 1 Thess 4:15-18 where we find a question about just who goes to heaven first? Will it be those who alive when Christ returns? Or will it be those who are resurrected? Here is Paul's answer:
1 Thess 4:15 For this is what we tell YOU by the Lord’s word, that we the living who survive to the presence of the Lord shall in no way precede those who have fallen asleep [in death]; 16 because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. 17 Afterward we the living who are surviving will, together with them, be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we shall always be with [the] Lord.
Now let's just stop and analyze this. What do we learn from this scripture?
1) For one, everybody goes to heaven at the same time! No one precedes anyone else up to heaven.
2) We know the dead rise FIRST! Then AFTERWARD all together to go heaven.
So what is this saying? It is saying that if those who have died and been resurrected don't get their spiritual bodies until those who are living when Christ returns get theirs so that all together get their spiritual bodies, then the dead who rise must rise back into the flesh!
That is, the first resurrection of the elect who have died in Christ rise first back into the flesh before Christ's return. Then they join those of the elect who are alive when Christ returns, so that everyone is in the flesh at the time of Christ's return. Then, of course, Christ himself also returns in the flesh to rule for 1000 years. After that Satan is destroyed and then JUDGMENT DAY takes place. Then after the last person is judged, then is when the elect, having finished their work as king-priests on the earth, go to heaven with Christ.
There is no way around this. This is yet another misunderstanding (false teaching) the witnesses. That is, that since 1914 those of the "anointed" who die faithfully go straight up to heaven. WRONG! No one goes to heaven before anyone else! Thus they have a complicated and convulted explanation about just when the anointed who survive Armageddon will go to heaven. You know, Armageddon occurs, the 1000 years begin, but some of the anointed are still on the earth? They even said it is possible, being of very old age that some of the anointed just might die from the trauma of Armageddon and go to heaven then, but that didn't mean Jehovah was killing them as punishment! WRONG!
At any rate, 1 Thessalonians along with other scriptures confirm that Christ will be in the flesh at the second coming and will rule with his king-priests, who will also be in the flesh and thus that rule will be hands-on on the earth! But doesn't that make sense? How much more effective would that rule be if all were right there present in the flesh? Otherwise, how do they rule from heaven? Giving inspired dreams to selected "other sheep" elders who do the actual work?
Plus you have other issues. For instance, when Satan is let loose to test the post-millennial population, those rebels are said to "encircle the camp of the holy ones." Now is that literal? Or figurative? That is, how do they encircle the camp of the holy ones if the holy ones are in heaven and they are on the earth?
REV 20:7 Now as soon as the thousand years have been ended, Satan will be let loose out of his prison, 8 and he will go out to mislead those nations in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Ma´gog, to gather them together for the war. The number of these is as the sand of the sea. 9 And they advanced over the breadth of the earth and encircled the camp of the holy ones and the beloved city. But fire came down out of heaven and devoured them. 10 And the Devil who was misleading them was hurled into the lake of fire and sulphur, where both the wild beast and the false prophet [already were]; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
How can they encircle the beloved city if the holy ones are ruling from heaven? But if the holy ones are on the earth, then the "beloved city" certainly could be a reference to the capital city from which Christ will be ruling. This sounds like this is happening on earth, does it not? I mean they are said to "advance over the breadth of the earth" to get to this beloved city and the camp! So the camp must be on the earth. But what is surprising about this? That is, it is not surprising we have this earthly description because Christ and the elect will actually be on the earth at this time!
I recently attended a church service in which one of my relatives was the minister. Just as a passing question, I asked about the millennium rule of Christ and where it would be? Of course, he thought it would be from heaven. But I asked about Satan being let loose after the 1000 years and where would this be? I was trying to get him to see that there would be people on the earth during the 1000-year reign. But his response was not to deal with it! Very much like witnesses who sniff an "apostate" attack! So some people get one idea in their minds and they hold on to that idea by closing their eyes and not examining anything else that makes them THINK!
The WTS does the identical same thing! Case in point if you ask just how is it that Christ's impalement is at the third hour (9 o'clock) (Mark 15:25) while his trial is not until the sixth hour (12 o'clock)? (John 19:14). Or you ask how is it that it gets dark at the sixth hour after Jesus' impalement, but his trial is not until the sixth hour? The WTS admits they do not know but regardless, it's okay, they know the Bible is true and Christ still died for our sins!
A Seeming Discrepancy. Some have pointed to what appears to be a discrepancy between the statement at Mark 15:25, which says Jesus was impaled at “the third hour,” and that at John 19:14, which indicates that by “about the sixth hour” Jesus’ final trial before Pilate was just ending. John had access to Mark’s account, and he certainly could have repeated the time stated by Mark. Therefore John must have had a reason for stating the hour differently from Mark.
Why the seeming discrepancy? A variety of suggestions have been offered. None of these satisfy all objections. We simply do not have enough information to explain with any certainty the reason for this difference between the accounts. Perhaps Mark’s or John’s reference to the hour was parenthetical, not in chronological order. Whatever the case, one thing is certain: Both writers were inspired by holy spirit.
The synoptic Gospels clearly indicate that by the sixth hour, or 12 noon, Jesus had already been hanging on the stake long enough for the soldiers to cast lots over his garments and for the chief priests, the scribes, the soldiers, and other passersby to speak abusively of him. They also indicate that about 3:00 p.m. Jesus expired. (Mt 27:38-45; Mr 15:24-33; Lu 23:32-44) The truly important thing to remember is that Jesus died for our sins on Nisan 14, 33 C.E.—Mt 27:46-50; Mr 15:34-37; Lu 23:44-46. t
You see, they don't have the answer and can't figure it out because it doesn't fit their false teaching about when Christ died!
But really, there is no discrepancy. The problem is the WTS itself who doesn't follow the Bible nor knows about Passover ritual and tradition. If they did, they would know that Passover is the first event that occurs on the 1st day of unfermented cakes. It is eaten from sundown to midnight. Then later that day they celebrate the festival of unfermented cakes. The Israelites left Egypt the same night passover is eaten. Thus passover is eaten on the same day as they celebrate the festival of unfermented cakes, the day they leave Egypt, which was Nisan 15th. Now part of the misunderstanding comes from the dating. That is, they think while the sabbath day begins at sunset that also the DATE changes at sunset. But this is not correct. The Israelites when they first left Egypt followed Egyptian custom of changing the solar date at midnight. Thus it was exactly like today. The sabbath is clearly Saturday, but it begins on Friday after sunset. Thus it was still Nisan 14th from sunset to midnight; after midnight it turned to the 15th. But that means that Jesus was arrested on Nisan 15th, which is always a special sabbath day, and thus could not have died that day. The Bible clearly says he died on a day of preparation just before a great sabbath, meaning a special sabbath. Plus he was in the grave for three nights. It is easy to count back from Saturday night to Thursday night. So we know Jesus died on a Thursday and we know that Thursday had to be a day of preparation before a "great sabbath" or a "high sabbath." When we look at a calendar of 33 CE, we see that, indeed, Thursday, Nisan 20th, was a special day of preparation before the "high sabbath" of the 21st. The 15th and the 21st are special "high sabbaths" of Passover week. Further, for him to be in the grave for THREE NIGHTS, and to rise after a sabbath, you have to have two sabbath days in a row. You can't die on a Friday and rise on a Saturday night and claim you were in the grave for "three nights." Thus in 33 CE, that Friday is a special sabbath of passover, the 21st, which is followed by the regular sabbath. So, indeed, you have two sabbath days in a row for that weekend; a special sabbath followed by a regular sabbath.
So now, everything works out. Jesus ate passover on the sabbath day of the 1st day of unfermented cakes, while it was still Nisan 14th until midnight. The meal ends at midnight at which time the date changes to the 15th. Jesus was thus arrested on the 15th, which was early that Saturday morning. Pilate didn't see him until just before noon ("but early" meaning just before the early evening watch which is from noon to 3 pm; John 18:28). He then sent him to Herod to be examined. Herod had all the way until that following Wednesday to try Jesus since that week some prisoner would be let loose on the day before the sabbath. So the morning of Wednesday, Nisan 19th is when Pilate and Herod became close political friends over what was happening with Jesus. Then Jesus' final trial at noon was Wednesday, Nisan 19th. Then he was impaled that night at 9 p.m. (the "third hour") and remained impaled all that night until the next day until at noon it became dark for three hours, then Jesus died. That's it. No discrepancy at all.
Now the WTS has been told this and knows this and has for a long time. But willl they change their false teaching about Jesus dying on Nisan 14th? No. They are like the prophesied "goats" who buck against truth and insist on their superficial teachings, just like people in Christendom sometimes hate to think through new things that might contradict what they have decided is true. They quickly note these details are not important and doesn't change that Christ died for our sins! Yes, but why not go further and understand the TRUTH? Why insist on preaching falsehood?
In fact, I think I'm going to put out a brochure for this "Easter" and Passover time called: "JESUS DID NOT DIE ON NISAN 14TH!" It will show how Jesus must die on Nisan 20th to be accurate with scripture. It's the least I can do. I won't mention anything about JWs in it; I don't want to be labeled as part of a "hate group." I'll keep it simple though and emphasize how Passover is eaten on a special sabbath day, always! If that's the case, then he could not have been impaled that same day.
Also, in passing (I'm smiling at this), the local church which I attended was gearing up for EASTER! I'd forgotten what a big deal Easter was in Christendom. When I mentioned to my relative-pastor that "Easter was a pagan holiday worshipping the goddess Ishtar", he didn't want to hear a thing about it! Even though you can find this on the internet and it is rather common knowledge. Christ's resurrection has nothing to do with rabbits and eggs, but fertility worship does! Anyway, this was something that he just didn't want to discuss. But it reminded me of the witnesses, who simply don't discuss or hear anything that challenges them! They are totally open for long discussions and Bible studies as long as you don't ask any questions that expose their false teachings. The moment you do, you're an "apostate" and they shut you down, but also their own minds. It's sad. But it's one of the ways they can maintain their false teachings! Just ignore figuring anything out!
Perhaps this is why in Revelation, the Lamb-Dragon beast that comes out of the "earth" and thus represents Jehovah's earthly organization, the witnesses, is said to be an image of the "666 beast" which is trinity-666-believing Christgendom (that comes out of the "sea"). Both foster false teachings and maintain that by bucking against any discussion or in-depth reasoning on things that contradict them. It's the same love for spiritual darkness that Christendom has. Christendom thinks Easter is a wonderful Christian holidy and the witnesses think they are living in a "spiritual paradise" -- both of which are made possible by closed eyes and closed minds.