august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
why did god if he is so loving create viruses like Ebola and the Plague?
Whenever I asked that, I was told they must have served some useful purpose but that was changed after Adam and Eve sinned.
Like all religitards they have an illogical answer for everything.
i have posted questions on christian web sites.
those questions have always been polite and i have never used questionable language.
the questions weren't exactly in support of christians though.. what did i get for my efforts?.
Welcome to the forum. Another UK member here. I think we share many views!
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
Philosophy is then needed to understand all facets of evolution.
No it isn't................What the hell are you taking Simon Says?
what year comes to your mind as the happiest?
maybe some special place you lived, being with special people, an unforgettable period that made it your happiest.
I am 48.
2015 has been the happiest year of my life, everything is coming together nicely for me and family, 6 years after leaving the cult.
i just wanted to put it out there that i am actually truly impressed by the revised nwt.
i think it's an awesome bible version.. the only issues i have are that it should only have "jehovah" in the new testament when quoting the old, and the alternate translation of john 1:1 in the footnote should be in the main text..
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
James - Our ancestors were apelike creatures but were very different from modern apes. One our ancestors gave rise to to both modern humans and moderns apes. The illustration that book attempts to show are different stages of human evolution but obviously the changes between each of those stages was gradual and took place over many 1000's of generation, Each of those generations would have looked just like the previous one, the changes accumulated over time.
Its a bit like looking at photographs of someone at different stages of life - if you looked at photos of a person as a baby, a toddler, a preteen, a teenager a 50 year old and a 90 year old you wouldn't assume that the individual jumped from one stage to another would you? You know that every day gradual changes occur, so subtly that you can not detect those changes day by day. But if you jump forward in time the changes are obvious.
It is the same with the fossil record. The fossils that we have are like "photos" of different stages of the evolution of humans. In effect we have a record of the baby, the toddler, the preteen etc. but we don't have every photo in between. The missing "photos" represent many generations, every generation showing subtle differences that gradually accumulate to create significant changes.
is macroevolution a word made up by evolutionary scientists and darwinists, or did creationists come up with that word?.
because, from my understanding, there is no such thing as macroevolution.
an ape didn't give birth to a human, for instance.
august 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
Another one in the same vain
