Heaven

Joined

• started 14 topics
• posted 7,754 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Heaven

• 
  81

  Did you hear that!? His Honour is insisting that Jackson attend the Royal Commission

  by umbertoecho in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  i actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".

  it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.

  this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  That 'Theocratic Warfare' doesn't seem to be very effective, does it.
  
• 
  12

  Australian branch co-ordinator Terrence O'Brien gets called out for lying to the Royal Commission

  by Mickey mouse in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  watch from 1:47:00 as angus stewart of the royal commission investigation into child abuse calls out the australian branch co-ordinator for lying about geoffrey jackson's role on the governing body.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  The GB don't want to appear because they know they are ultimately responsible as they vote on all policy. They know they are f'cked.
  
• 
  37

  [Day 7 - 5/8]The Royal Commissions investigation of child sexual abuse within Jehovah’s Witnesses. + VIDEO

  by C0ntr013r in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.

  part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  Yes! I am so glad McClellan requested Jackson to appear 'sometime next week'. These WT lawyers so tried to protect Jackson and it didn't work. Good!
  
• 
  37

  [Day 7 - 5/8]The Royal Commissions investigation of child sexual abuse within Jehovah’s Witnesses. + VIDEO

  by C0ntr013r in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  i give you day 7 of the royal commissions proceedings:.

  part 1 has been uploaded and part 2 and 3 will soon be available.. part 1:.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0lgqedy_i.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  So right off on Day 7, Stewart is establishing that the WT lawyer in the Day 6 testimony lied by saying Geoffrey Jackson would not be of any help in these proceedings by getting Toole to agree the GB do set policy globally.
  
• 
  38

  Samuel Herd 3 min video - the most misogynistic words I ever heard from a "godly man"

  by paradisebeauty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=72&v=9vvqxf9uwu0.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  sparrowdown said: So why did they hire a female "expert" to speak on their behalf at the ARC?

  The answer is optics. It will BS a lot of people including JWs themselves into believing they are modernistic enough. It doesn't phase the RC. You just have to start digging into JW written material and speak to abused victims to know how women are treated in the Borg.
  
• 
  38

  Samuel Herd 3 min video - the most misogynistic words I ever heard from a "godly man"

  by paradisebeauty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=72&v=9vvqxf9uwu0.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  Once again, a GB member shows just how ignorant and uneducated they all are. Sammy baby, it's the other way around. We all start out female at conception you moron.
  
• 
  38

  [Day 6 - 4/8]The Royal Commissions investigation of child sexual abuse within Jehovah’s Witnesses. + VIDEO

  by C0ntr013r in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  unfortunately, part 1 will not be available until later, but i thought i give you the other parts anyway .

  day six of the proceedings:.

  part 2 has been uploaded and part 3,4 and (5?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  Thanks, OC. Conflicting testimonies and statements don't make these guys look good.
  
• 
  21

  where there was a conflict between the Bible and science, the Bible would prevail, because all scripture is "inspired by God"

  by freemindfade in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  thought i would put this in its own thread.

  it another embarrassing statement from the rc (royal commission not regional convention lol).

  it's not even one about abuse, its about the jw's stance on science and the bible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  Rod knee-to-the-Groin Stinks... let me just fix that for ya... what you REALLY mean is:
  

  "Where there was a conflict between our interpretation of the Bible and Science, our interpretation prevails because all scripture in inspired bygod, and our organization, being chosen by Jesus who returned invisibly in 1914, taking 5 years to examine all others, declared, in 1919, Jehovah's Witnesses to be God's one True organization and that our Governing Body is God's sole Channel of Communication".

  There... that's better.

  The crazy... it burns!
  
• 
  24

  RC: an emotional trigger?

  by sparrowdown in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  is this rc triggering any painful memories for anyone else?

  .

  for me, it's stirring up all the emotions of what it felt like dealing with assholes like this.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  I can only watch so much of the hearings. I do hope positive change occurs but remain skeptical.
  
• 
  38

  [Day 6 - 4/8]The Royal Commissions investigation of child sexual abuse within Jehovah’s Witnesses. + VIDEO

  by C0ntr013r in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  unfortunately, part 1 will not be available until later, but i thought i give you the other parts anyway .

  day six of the proceedings:.

  part 2 has been uploaded and part 3,4 and (5?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Heaven

  Exactly what do JW elders do to ensure a child is kept safe within their congregation? Spinks is stating they do everything they can including removing the child from the situation. Huh? This is not my understanding at all.

  Can you guys comment on this?