Back when Rutherfraud said this, JWs were considered a 'sect' and not a 'religion'.
My Mom was crystal clear with me on this fact.
Back when Rutherfraud said this, JWs were considered a 'sect' and not a 'religion'.
My Mom was crystal clear with me on this fact.
Well, I do, of course. My levels of seratonin, endorphins, dopamine, and melatonin, to name a few, are all key factors in the functioning of my brain.
last time i was at the kingdom hall they were praising themselves about all the growth in members they have been having.
is this "growth" they are having statistically accurate?or are a lot leaving?
I suspect that even if Botchtower tracks people who leave, I am not sure they'd publish those facts. It probably doesn't look good.
With a large majority of the industrialized world's people aging, there is quite a number who will become too old to witness and will die off in the next 20 years.
My Father is one of these people. I have no idea what his official status is as a JW. I suspect it is 'inactive'. I guarantee they've removed him as a Ministerial Servant. He no longer has the ability to witness. Dementia has a way of doing that to a person.
The 'racket' part is a reference to something shady or illegal. As in:
Racket (crime), a systematised element of organized crime
As prologos said, the snare is a reference to a trap such as this:
as i sat through another mind numbing sermon this morning i could not help thinking that the speaker was a total clown.. lime green suit, white shirt, yellow tie, blue socks barely higher than his ankle, brown shoes, and an orange cast.
all that was missing was a big red rubber nose!
and of course everyone remarked what a wonderful talk he gave.
Love the clown pics.
years ago, the insinuation was often presented, that those who were inactive were actually not witnesses at all.
the point being made was that ''...winesses is a verb, not a noun...''.
i know there were published assertions to this end in the older books and magazines, with possibly even quotes from the likes of rutherford or knorr ,.
i was just invited.
i thanked my old elder friend and he left.
(i'm not going).
so i had about had enough of reading jw's excuses online about wt child abuse and the candace conti nightline abc video about her case.
this is a really deep burning topic to me as i'm sure it is to many of you.
so today the gloves came off.
I think a key question to ask any 'Sister' is this:
If you were molested by an elder or other male member of your congregation would you continue being a Jehovah's Witness and go to the same hall that your abuser goes to?
Edited to Add:
Awesome job, Mr. Flipper.