It was the Worldwide Church of God, a cult similar to the Watchtower Society circa. "Judge" Rutherford.
Watch the documentary on my blog, if you want.
can anyone please help me to find the link to the church that changed or reviewed its doctrines.
i remember seeing a documentary somewhere.. many thanks.
j.
It was the Worldwide Church of God, a cult similar to the Watchtower Society circa. "Judge" Rutherford.
Watch the documentary on my blog, if you want.
excerpts from the 2011 yearbook highlights of the past year:.
tracing all things with accuracy.
(p.9) jesus said that the faithful slave would be discreet in giving the domestics "their food at the proper time".
Stunning arrogance. Keep on tightening the grip.
there are many "proof" texts that people (including jws) use to justify their rejection of anyone that is gay.
there are a few scriptures that you can pull up and try to make a case for show homosexuals why they are evil and wrong.. i've been researching more of these scriptures and i'm coming to some very different conclusions than many other christians hold, especially jws.
i wanted to talk about the first text used by many people to condemn homosexual behaviour.
It is disingenuous to say that the city was destroyed because of lack of hospitality.
Why?
If the explanation for the destruction of Sodom, namely its sin or lack of righteousness, is explained in the Bible, how is it disingenuous to hold to that view?
Perhaps we struggle in our post-Watchtower pit of confusion to see that homosexuality might not be the ire-inducing crime the Governing Body (and mainstream, "orthodox", evangelicals) says it is. My understanding of Jesus is that he was always more concerned about social justice than sexual sin. His righteousness reflected that of the Father, therefore the Father is angered and upset by the poor and needy being ignored or abused. And that was what was going on in Sodom.
there are many "proof" texts that people (including jws) use to justify their rejection of anyone that is gay.
there are a few scriptures that you can pull up and try to make a case for show homosexuals why they are evil and wrong.. i've been researching more of these scriptures and i'm coming to some very different conclusions than many other christians hold, especially jws.
i wanted to talk about the first text used by many people to condemn homosexual behaviour.
The sin of Sodom wasn't homosexuality or sexual depravity.
Ezekiel 16:49 says it was being arrogant, greedy, overfed and having no regard for the poor or needy.
That's more in line with Jesus than it is with fundamentalist, evangelical Christianity. So, which is right?
As for Lot and his willingness to let his daughters be raped, that speaks more about the man than it does about God. Genesis is documenting what happened, but doesn't make any moral commentary on it.
God saved Lot and his kin, not because of how righteous they were, but because of his grace.
God doesn't hate gay people; he hates arrogant fat arses who don't give a damn about the poor. This is borne out by the prophets who continually warned Israel, not about their disregard for the Law, but about their lack of social justice. And in the life of Jesus, who didn't condemn anyone for their sexuality, but who spoke up for the poor, marginalised and down-trodden in society.
How come so many "students of the Bible" miss that?
i'll start off.. i don't believe anything is divine about bible writings.
i believe there may be some marginal history although not much.
i think alot of folk tales and regional myths are contained in the old testament.
Who believes the Bible about what?
In most respects I agree with Syl. The Church has created a monster, in some ways, with how they handle the Bible. Words like "authority" and "inerrant" don't help anyone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phvc_jv6vte.
"Failed haberdasher"; I coined that. You owe me 50p.
my best friend does not know about my recent mental defection from the watchtower, but i am having trouble keeping my feelings from him completely....so, last night, i asked my him if he thought the governing body was always in 100% agreement about every policy/doctrine decision they make.
" i asked him how he thought they went about making those decisions and he said that, "they probably discuss it as a group, research it, read the bible together, and discuss it some more until they come to a conclusion...just like a boe would when deciding a judicial matter.
" i said: "don't you think that if they were jehovah's 'mouth-piece' and they are indeed being guided by jesus christ and holy spirit, that there would be no doubt about what the right course of action is?
The Governing Body can't even make its mind up who appoints the elders.
the april wt is out, get it while you can.
what caught my attention was the first article.
some quotes:.
Just to be clear, Moses didn't lead the Israelites into the promised land. Joshua did.
Also, the Bible (Hebrews 3:3) makes it clear that Jesus is the greater fulfilment of Moses. The Governing Body have lost the plot on this one.the april wt is out, get it while you can.
what caught my attention was the first article.
some quotes:.
This is further proof of GB 2.0 ratcheting up the control in the build up to 2014.
Blogged my thoughts here.
just found these figures for the uk circut assembly halls and my jaw dropped when i saw how much money they all have in the bank!!.
here are some stats from the uk, well start off with some of the uk assembly halls.. .
the surrey assembly hall of jehovahs witnesses is sitting with just under a cool 4 million in the bank.
Not all of those assets are tied to property. If you read the reports carefully you see that in some cases the assembly halls are sitting on £millions in CASH.
It's on my blog, btw - http://thegoverningbody.org