just had a quick read through the new 16 page edition of the watchtower, and noticed an article about able who was adam's son.
the article said in part.
abel speaks to you today.
was I a complete heretic
No. Current doctrine is that the "creative days" may have lasted "considerable lengths of time." (Was Life Created, p. 26) " The Bible’s creative days allow for thousands of years of time each. Further, the earth was already in existence before the creative days began." (Awake! Jun 8 2002, p. 10)
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
Interestingly, the German "2012 printing" edition contains the original text on page 84. Mentioning that the Bible Students were right only in the 19th century ;)
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
the empty page in this other version indicates a copyright issue
Forget this. This version is without pictures at all, for whatever reason.
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
During the 19th century, sincere Bible students calculated that the waiting period would end in 1914.
During the 19th and 20th centuries, sincere Bible students progressively discerned that the waiting period would end in 1914.
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
IMHO the empty page in this other version indicates a copyright issue (picture licensed for print only but not for web publishing). They did this in their early PDF publications (replace copyrighted pictures with empty pages). But then I wonder why they still have the picture on the website.
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
Here's the new PDF version:
while in another official PDF version, claiming to be "2009 printing", page 83 is completely empty:
http://www.jw-media.org/rus/publications/bh_e.pdf
Though in the PDF that was downloadable from jw.org a while ago, the old picture was there.
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
Ok .. here are the pictures from page 13:
But I can't see any difference on page 83:
did anyone else notice the artwork change on page 12 and on page 83?
im new to this and cannot get the pictures to upload....but if you have a copy of the book and compare it with the pdf online, there is definitely a change.. what qould cause them to to this?.
i would be interesting to see if there were any changes to the wording of the paragraphs.
Did they replace the picture in the online version minutes ago???
watchtower's weirdest photograph?.
you wont believe it when you see it.
and is available at: http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2012/10/watchtowers-weirdest-photograph.html.
To me this guy alone doesn't look too weird:
Same for this guy in the back - watched alone, he seems normal:
But in the context of the other people, he seems a bit distorted, as if photographed from a different angle:
i know it is a big ask but i have a personal message in german that i need to translate into english.
tried the online translators and they are good but there are some important nuances i think i am missing.
james.
Too late it seems. If you still need my help just contact me.
