i spoke to an elderly sister, 94, who is deteriorating rapidly.
she honestly believed she would never die.. obviously she is desperate to deny to herself that the cult she allowed to steal her one and only life a second at a time is still true.. "the generation change is just like 1975 - we were sifted.
we were being tested as to who was serving jehovah for a date and those with unbreakable trust in the organisation he has appointed.".
My own Mother ( who started stockpiling tined food and packet soups in 1974) now says "they never said ANYTHING about 1975."
My parents often told me about 1975 that they knew it couldn't be true. Unfortunately they never shared this divine understanding.
I don't quite understand why Obama hates children so much.
No need to understand something when it's untrue. Explain this.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Wednesday signed a law expanding a health program to include 3.5 million uninsured children, advancing an overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system despite the embarrassing withdrawal of his nominee to lead the initiative.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5135JJ20090204?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
Maybe you only cherry-pick what supports your preconceived assessment?
Burn, I was reacting to the review you posted.
Consider high trade barriers, farm price supports and production limits, price and entry regulations in transportation and energy, interest rate caps and branching restrictions, national-origin immigration quotas—does Paul Krugman really wish to defend such things?I don't believe that Krugman defends these heavy regulations.
The reign of non-regulated free market mechanisms has created huge income differences and social inequality. The pendulum has swung too far in the other direction. A new balance is needed. No need to throw the child out with the bath water though. I don't think that's Krugman's view either.
this is big news from the vatican.
they now accept charles darwin's theory of evolution.. it still doesn't explain why there are monkeys living today - surely they would have evolved by now into humans?
can anyone explain this?.
According to JWN poster slimboyfat, JWs will follow suit...
this is big news from the vatican.
they now accept charles darwin's theory of evolution.. it still doesn't explain why there are monkeys living today - surely they would have evolved by now into humans?
can anyone explain this?.
RCC has a long history of embracing darwinism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_and_the_Roman_Catholic_Church
The International Theological Commission in a July 2004 statement endorsed by Cardinal Ratzinger
According to the widely accepted scientific account, the universe erupted 15 billion years ago in an explosion called the 'Big Bang' and has been expanding and cooling ever since. Later there gradually emerged the conditions necessary for the formation of atoms, still later the condensation of galaxies and stars, and about 10 billion years later the formation of planets. In our own solar system and on earth (formed about 4.5 billion years ago), the conditions have been favorable to the emergence of life. While there is little consensus among scientists about how the origin of this first microscopic life is to be explained, there is general agreement among them that the first organism dwelt on this planet about 3.5 - 4 billion years ago. Since it has been demonstrated that all living organisms on earth are genetically related, it is virtually certain that all living organisms have descended from this first organism. Converging evidence from many studies in the physical and biological sciences furnishes mounting support for some theory of evolution to account for the development and diversification of life on earth, while controversy continues over the pace and mechanisms of evolution. [10]
this article out lines the truth about the global warming scam.
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/38574742.html.
and I am not going to chase down every source before I post them.
You'd better doe.
this article out lines the truth about the global warming scam.
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/38574742.html.
Serious question--does anyone on here care about discussing facts?
Serious answer: I do. More serious answer: I did discuss them. Most serious answer: I'm sure I'm right. Period.
this dilemma was posed to me by a good friend.
it took me quite a while to come to a decision, i will tell you my answer after your responses.. .
feel free to ask any question you need to clarify this problem.. .
This problem discredits the (unconditional) non-aggression principle.
but not ok to criticize muslims for saudi arabia and other islamic theocracies for their behavior, funding of terrorism, etc?
discuss...
It isn't, of course. Many ethnic Jews are very skeptical about their zionistic peers.
Btw, if you say "politically correct", what political ideology are you talking about or have you just made up the claim yourself?
