I think it's hilarious that when you post facts there is still always someone arguing it.
I went back to some of your topics and posts and I'm not sure what facts you are talking about. Most of the posts I have read on this board are personal experiences (always more than one side to one of those -- usually as many "factual" versions as there are parties to the event being recounted) and doctrinal discussions (which rarely ever could be described as fitting in the realm of "fact" because they utilize histories -- see reverence to personal experiences above -- or interpretations).
Makes you want to stop bothering if people don't want to learn.
You have freedom to share and others have freedom to agree or disagree. Quite a concept, at least it was for me. I was also a 5th generation JW (saying "was" because even though I am not DAd or DFd I no longer consider myself a JW).
But then again my family has only been in the truth for 100 years so what would I know?
I don't know how old you are, but I am 54 and my great-great grandfather who got the "truth" from Pastor Russell himself was a Civil War (Confederate) veteran. So I have memories of the "truth" going back to the 1950s on a personal level, and accounts of my mother and grandmother's family history going back much farther than that. However, what any of us "knows" on a personal level is dependent on a lot of things -- the quality of our recollection, the existence of documentation AND the context in which the documentation was prepared, etc.
Most of us are trying to overcome YEARS of programming -- years of "unquestioned answers" -- years of not being able to voice a dissenting opinion. So we LIKE that we can question things now -- even someone else's "facts" -- with impunity and relish.
Sounds to me that you are taking objections raised to your "facts" personally. Just because someone questions what you say doesn't mean they are questioning your moral or ethical character -- even though that mindset is promoted by the Borg. In the real world, people disagree about the "facts" all the time -- even in the face of "evidence" to support those "facts". Arguing the "facts" is lucrative business -- ask any attorney :-)
Just my 2 cents,
NanaR