Just because you think it is a stupid question, does not make it so.
You're right. That's why I spent a lot of time, like other posters in this thread, explaining why I disagreed with him. I presented evidence from the Watchtower's own publications. I have detailed examples of the sorts of things I've seen, and I addressed specific parts of Derrick's posts. I never said it was a stupid question and just left it at that, and it's dishonest for you to insinuate that I have.
Derrick has a right to ask questions.
Did I say he didn't? If not, what's your point?
And yet you took insult.
No, I disagreed. There's a difference. What, are we all supposed to hold hands and gape with respect anytime one of us offers up an opinion? Warm fuzzies for everybody? I still say that discussion boards are for discussion. What's your problem with that?
Can you please allow somebody to live a life outside of this board?
In what way am I preventing people from living a life outside of this board? Are you usually this melodramatic? If you are referring to the way I accused Derrick of a "hit and run," I apologized for that. I meant it, too. Why are you still bringing it up? Why are you still "taking insult"?
I had forgotten all about your posts. Wow, I know that it seems impossible that somebody wouldn't wait with baited breath to hear your clever responses, but I didn't.
I had forgotten your posts, too. I never complained about you not posting to this topic again. Frankly, I was glad you didn't -- you obviously have little of substance to contribute to the topic of this thread -- which currently has to do with Derrick's claim about a major Watchtower doctrine, not some petty remark I made and, once again, apologized for already.
You are obviously itching for a fight.
No. This is an interesting and important discussion to me. I assumed it was for Derrick, too. As for you -- am I supposed to apologize to you for saying that you defended Derrick? Was that such a terrible thing to have done?
But it's a good old Watchtower trick you're trying to pull -- instead of addressing anything I've said about the topic, malign my motives so people will have an excuse to ignore me.
You are right, you falsely accused Derrick and now he has responded to you so,
That "false accusation," which I apologized for nearly a week ago now, is not the point of this thread. The point of this thread has to do with Derrick's claim that the Watchtower does NOT teach that all non-Witnesses will die at Armageddon. I happen to disagree with Derrick. I gave reasons why, just like I gave reasons for disagreeing with your post, when you said Derrick was saying something that he didn't say. You know, I took your post to heart and reread Derrick's original post carefully. And I just don't see what you were talking about. I already explained why. Why not respond to that?
Derrick has yet to respond to the evidence I presented in this discussion. You have yet to do anything except complain about my attitude.
there is no need to address it.
Then what was the point of your post?
Dedalus