in talking with my wife regarding abstaining from blood, she referred to the old test.
laws.. so i asked why does the wt take the stance of df, if in the old test.
you just basically had.
In talking with my wife regarding abstaining from blood, she referred to the old test. laws.
So I asked why does the WT take the stance of DF, if in the old test. you just basically had
to wash in the river and remain outside the village for sometime(a day). It would seem to me that they
are adding to the law. Can someone help me understand?
what am i missing?
why are the illegal immigrants demanding their rights?
they're illegal, they don't have the rights of an american citizen because they are not citizens.
To Misocup,
This statement you made is not true, I work in public aid. You are just making general statements with no facts to support them.
No citizen would be denied because of race. TANF/food stamps does not consider race when determining if you are eligible.
When my daughter needed public assistance after her ex left her and their 6 week old son, they told her they couldn't do anything for her because she isn't a minority.
and to Sapphire, you make it sound so easy. Trust me, it is not. There are only a few green card numbers that come up each year for England, not nearly as many afforded to other countries. There is a "Diversity" program, that allows more flexibility to some countries.
There is a definite preference when it comes to govt. assistance, and it is not in the favor of whites. Not racist, just fact. I doubt it happens all over the country but it really does happen here in the South West.
...and archaeologists.
saw awhile ago on a post about historically uncovered evidence of times and kingdoms past...and it was mentioned there are no dates in the bible.
ok, i'm little slow, but any interrupted date dub have depends on these bonediggers a lot.
You know I went round and round with a JW visiting my home about, accepting information from worldly historians, but rejecting them when it doesn't fit JW way of thinking.
For the life of him, he either couldn't or wouldn't accept the fact that if accepts one date, then he would have to also accept the other dates. He would then say well the JW use their own calculations and I would counter from where there are no dates in the bible to confirm 607.
first of all, no recording.
i don't have a recorder.
i arrived at the location rather early, about an hour and a half before the talk was to begin.
Hi Mavie,
Was this the DC in Tacoma, Wa if so I know the 1st young lady.
can someone help me out here, i have been going back and forth with the jw study, regarding 586/607, from reading what has been written here and visiting the library.. i have been able to present what i understand.
now he is saying that the jw also were able to locate the date for the fall of jerusalem based on the kings of isreal.
i serious doubt it, he should me the list of jews kings in the "insight on the scriptures" but could tell me how they arrived at the start date for the 1st king.
Can someone help me out here, I have been going back and forth with the JW study, Regarding 586/607, from reading what has been written here and visiting the library.
I have been able to present what I understand. Now he is saying that the JW also were able to locate the date for the Fall of Jerusalem based on the Kings of Isreal. I serious doubt it, he should me the list of Jews Kings in the "Insight on the scriptures" but could tell me how they arrived at the start date for the 1st King. He said they used the bible. Is thie even possible?
....for saying "nappy headed hos".
he's off tv and radio.
personally, he's never been my favorite but i like him more than the reverend al sharpton!
You are not the only person that has comment on this board.
....for saying "nappy headed hos".
he's off tv and radio.
personally, he's never been my favorite but i like him more than the reverend al sharpton!
Yes he has taken a stance and marched because of it. So because he didn't ask for them to be fired from the label makes it less credible? He has been very vocal and public, about how he feels about the current state of rap music.
....for saying "nappy headed hos".
he's off tv and radio.
personally, he's never been my favorite but i like him more than the reverend al sharpton!
Regarding negative rap music, MTV/BET and the people who sell it are control by money. You do understand a very high % (I think over 70%) who buy rap music are white teenagers and young adults. Rap music didn't start out negative and by and large it isn't, what you are hearing and seeing is what sell to the mainstream.
....for saying "nappy headed hos".
he's off tv and radio.
personally, he's never been my favorite but i like him more than the reverend al sharpton!
Confession,
I'm not a Sharpton fan but what you say about Sharpton not taking a stand against negative rap music isn't true. The media just hasn't covered it, like this incident. Also whore/ho didn't start with rap music. I know for a fact that early 70 movies (black explotation films) were using the word and it's safe to say that the word was in use before hollywood got to it.
the wts teaches that when an individual physically dies he is 'aquitted' or 'set free' from sin.
the verse they use to support this view is romans 6:7 which reads: .
7 for he who has died has been acquitted from [his] sin.. .
Hey Drew,
I have been meaning to post this question on here, but I have been going back and forth with this JW that comes by my house, regarding this verse. I just can't see how you can apply it so simply and then disregard Revelations 20:12. He said that this verse was talking about the 1000 years but I showed him that the dead didn't live until a 1000 years was finished. We went in circles.
