Sorry, but I also disagree strongly. If the internet wasn't a colossal threat, it wouldn't be talked about at every meeting. That is not an exaggeration; lately I have even heard it said several times at meetings that if it is not necessary to our livelyhood, we may want to avoid even having internet service in our home. The society would not spend so much time and energy demonizing the internet if it were not so scary to them.
The fact that many who leave over info they read on internet sites are maybe not as vocal and disruptive as some of the old-school apostates is actually another nail in the coffin for the society in my opinion. Think about it: the line between "apostate" and "normal person with reasonable doubts" is being blurred into nothing. The proof of that is in the number of posters on this board who still go to meetings somewhat (like me) for their family's sake, but are tuned in to the contradictions, inaccuracies, and guilt trips that are used. Just imagine all the people like me who go home after the meeting and find a way to subtly point out to their spouse just one little point where the watchtower was completely wrong. If you don't think this is going to have a devastating effect, you are mistaken.
I have a feeling the post was an attempt to throw many newbies off. Make the doubters doubt, if you will.