TheListener

Joined

• started 210 topics
• posted 3,839 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by TheListener

• 
  11

  My roommate went to the one day assembly yesterday

  by oppgirl63 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  1,940 people attended.

  10 baptized - 6 female, 4 male --- youngest 10 yrs old, oldest 66 yrs old.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  You're a good roommate. I hope that fact isn't lost on your roomie.
• 
  6

  Grace versus Ephesians 4th & 5th Chapters

  by TheListener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  for those who are believers in god and the bible:.

  if we have god's grace and have been purchased by jesus shed blood why do we have to be careful not to do the things mentioned in ephesians and elsewhere in order to not be excluded from god's kingdom?.

  for example, ephesians tells us not to tell obscene jokes, or commit immorality, etc etc for if we do we will not inherit god's kingdom.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  I have been really contemplating the posts I have received on this thread.

  If those that are willingly sinning have a 'dead faith' then they I they would be purposefully excusing themselves from life in God's kingdom.

  In Ephesians 4 and 5 (5:5) Paul is explicit in saying that those who are committing sins (he lists them, I won't) will not be in the kingdom of God.

  So, is one proper understanding this:

  If we have real faith it will save us. Real faith will manifest itself in our life's course - we'll not be wanton sinners but be on the road to allowing God's holy spirit to produce it's fruitage in us.

  If we profess faith but in fact do not have it we will, at some point along the path of our life, show ourselves for what we are.

  Thus we cannot be saved by works because the spirit is not in us; but we cannot have God's spirit and be one who sins willingly or we risk losing God's spirit and our place in his kingdom.

  Being an imperfect sinner would not make it a foregone conclusion that we couldn't be in God's kingdom.

  What this tells me is that we have to know and appreciate Jesus sacrifice and how he paid the price for our sin, live in accordance with Godly principles and we will be present in God's kingdom. However, if we are doing this and we sin, even grievously, we can, by virtue of Christ's sacrifice be forgiven and remain on the road to life.
• 
  36

  On our way to PA!!!

  by AuldSoul in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  ice and snow flurries most of the way there, and bitterly cold ... but we are thrilled.. a bad day today thanks to my father.

  thanks, dad!

  your prayer didn't work.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  I am so glad it all worked out.

  Your prayers really were answered.

  I wish you the best and can't wait to hear more news.

  When you get a chance please PM me your new phone number.
• 
  15

  Do JW's flout Romans 14:1?

  by yaddayadda in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  romans 14:1 .

  nwt welcome the [man] having weaknesses in [his] faith, but not to make decisions on inward questionings.

  niv accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  Also,

  Philippians 3:15 "All of us who are mature should take such a view of things. And if on some point you think differently, that too God will make clear to you. 16 Only let us live up to what we have already attained. " (NIV)
• 
  32

  They make mistakes just like 1st century christians did.

  by GBSJG in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  when i'm discussing problems i have with the wts with my family they often say well they make mistakes just like the early christians did, they are not perfect.. i try to argue that if you think that way you can go to any christian church and say the same.

  but usually they say that compared to other religions the wts makes less mistakes so you should go there.. i know that such reasoning doesn't make sense to me but what is a good response to this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  I read this point on the forum some time ago. I believe it was Auld Soul who wrote it. But, I could be wrong about that.

  What mistakes did the first century christians make after Jesus sent the helper (Holy Spirit) to them?

  All of their mistakes and misunderstandings about what Jesus said and meant happened before the Holy Spirit came and made all things clear.

  John 14:26 "But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you." (NIV)

  There was a running disagreement between some regarding physical/spiritual circumcision, however, that wasn't something they decided one way and then changed their mind on nor was it something individuals were kicked out of the congregation for.

  There may be other scriptures that are more pointed that I can't think of right now.

  If there is a witness rebuttal to this argument I would love to hear it so I can think of a rerebuttal.
• 
  6

  Grace versus Ephesians 4th & 5th Chapters

  by TheListener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  for those who are believers in god and the bible:.

  if we have god's grace and have been purchased by jesus shed blood why do we have to be careful not to do the things mentioned in ephesians and elsewhere in order to not be excluded from god's kingdom?.

  for example, ephesians tells us not to tell obscene jokes, or commit immorality, etc etc for if we do we will not inherit god's kingdom.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  For those who are believers in God and the Bible:

  If we have God's Grace and have been purchased by Jesus shed blood why do we have to be careful not to do the things mentioned in Ephesians and elsewhere in order to not be excluded from God's Kingdom?

  For example, Ephesians tells us not to tell obscene jokes, or commit immorality, etc etc for if we do we will not inherit God's Kingdom. Yet, in Ephesians chapter 2 we are told that being saved has nothing to do with our own works but only by God's Grace.

  This seems to be a question I've been struggling with for some time. And no, it's not because I want to tell obscene jokes, commit immorality, etc etc and still make it into God's kingom - you sickos. Wait, is that possible?
• 
  69

  crisis of conscience

  by cyrus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hi all ,got my copy today read 90 pages already ,so far very interesting and an eye opener rutherford comes across as a very dishonest man and a dictator.

  knorr comes across as very insecure.anyway back to it .have fun and i will let you know as i read more .dan

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  The Listener said,

  One thing I've learned since leaving the dubs; don't judge others (unless you have jury duty, or children, or a wife, or any other family, or perhaps at work with an employee or employer, or....well I don't know but judging isn't nice).

  Terry, I really didn't like the tone of your posts on this thread. I know, I know, that doesn't mean much.

  Ray Franz's books gave me the courage to break free from the witnesses. That is a gift I can never repay.

  Terry replied,

  Don't you get it? Personal integrity consists of telling the truth even when others are made uncomfortable or you yourself are put in an awkward position.

  My "tone" is clear. Nobody else points out these things because ONLY the good that Franz has done with his book is praised and all else ignored. I'm not judging him nor am I condemning him. I was answering a question raised under the discussion topic. I replied why I thought the "tone" of Crisis of Conscience was creepy.

  Can we ever get to a point we tell things "like it is" without tip-toeing?

  I have a couple thoughts on this. I tried to be forthright and tactful in saying that I didn't like the tone of your posts about Ray. We may disagree but I didn't beat around the bush, I was honest, forthright and clear. I thought. You may feel that you are not judging him or condeming but I feel that is exactly the tone your posts have taken. I don't feel like taking the time to copy/paste each statement you made wherein you made assumptions of Ray's possible choices and outcomes for different actions or how and what he felt like. I think that is unfair of you. Some have stated that they are disappointed that Ray wrote in support of the 607 date while knowing it was unsupportable. That is an opinion and who can say they are wrong for it? Isn't that the point of holding an opinion on a subject where feelings and emotions are involved? Was Ray wrong? right? Did the members of the dub body benefit or suffer based on Ray's decisions? The answers to these questions could be debated until time ends (if it ever does) but a conclusion could never be reached because the discussions would be based on personal feelings. It appears to me as I read your posts, and I say appears to me to indicate that I clearly may be incorrect and it may appear otherwise to someone else, that you do not agree with how Ray handled his Crisis of Conscience and all of the bits and pieces of political intrigue that went along with it. OK fair enough. I equally disagree and feel, based on my own anecdotal evidence that he did the best he could given the circumstances given - of course anecdotal evidence won't sway anyone - but it's good enough for me. AS and Terry - your discussion has taxed my dictionary and tired my brain. Please stop doing that. :)
• 
  57

  Governing Body Going After eBay

  by Gary1914 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hello everyone.. i don't if this has been posted before.

  if it has i apologize, but maybe my version will add to what is already known.. my brother is a district overseer.

  the society sometimes places conferences calls to do's, co's and other overseers, especially when it is something that they do not want to put in writing.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  Forget Ebay!

  Gary, your brother is a DO and he hangs out with you?

  I think you should be careful what you post.

  or

  I think you should sneak around his house (or wherever they are living) and bookbag and computer and copy everything you can get your hands on. Ooops. Bad idea. My bad. Sorry.
• 
  33

  i take some C.O. for a hour and half ride

  by johnny cip in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  (not telling where) into an hour and half conversation.

  he knew his aposatate stuff.

  it was heavy.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  More info CIP. We need details.
• 
  69

  crisis of conscience

  by cyrus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  hi all ,got my copy today read 90 pages already ,so far very interesting and an eye opener rutherford comes across as a very dishonest man and a dictator.

  knorr comes across as very insecure.anyway back to it .have fun and i will let you know as i read more .dan

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TheListener

  One thing I've learned since leaving the dubs; don't judge others (unless you have jury duty, or children, or a wife, or any other family, or perhaps at work with an employee or employer, or....well I don't know but judging isn't nice).

  Terry, I really didn't like the tone of your posts on this thread. I know, I know, that doesn't mean much.

  Ray Franz's books gave me the courage to break free from the witnesses. That is a gift I can never repay.