I have to go along with Waiting and RedhorseWoman here.
Holding things back or inside is not the way to overcome the dissapointment and anger that many feel. It needs to be gotten out, not held in.
Like Wainting said, to many times I was told to "think of the society", well I think now that it is time that we think about ourselves.
Like RedhorseWoman said, when they make claims to be God's only true channel they had better be making a good example for the rank and file to follow.
The double standards within the congregation and the society as a whole is not Christian. When elders and their families, MS and their families can get away with things simply because they are who they are, there is a problem.
Covering things up, pretending they aren't happening, isn't going to help us or anyone else in the congregation. The organization, from the congregation level all the way to the top, has got big problems. We are told NOT to talk about these things, let the elders take care of it. Well when the elders and there failies are the problems how can thing ever get taken care of? When letters are wrote to the society to ask for help, and it all gets sent back to the local level, how can things change?
I sat on the fence for a long time going by their rules. I kept my mouth shut, I ignored what was going on, I was a goo JW, or so they said. When I could take it no longer, when I couldn't stand to see others being shafted because they weren't in the clique, when I finally went to the C.O., I was the one who got marked as "bad association". Not the trouble makers, not the P.O.'s wife who was the "clique" leader and was treating people like dirt gossiping and telling lies about those she didn't like, no she still controls things. Now why is that?
The society has been pointing out the problems in "chistendom" for years. Now when the their problems are being exposed I don't think we should simply be quite and sit back and hold things in. No, I think it is time that the reall "truth" was brought out. Isn't that what they tell us to do?
<font color=red>"1974 “Consequently, is it unchristian today to offer Bible-based comments about anothers religion? The scriptural answer must be No. True, criticism that reveals faults in the teachings or practices of someone’s religion might at first seem severe. Yet, how should one react? Not like those who became violently enraged over Stephen’s criticism. Rather, note the fine reaction of some Athenians who heard Paul’s comments. They accepted the Bible truth and became believers, to their eternal benefit. Compare Acts17:11, 12. Far from being rejected as unchristian then, criticism based on Gods word should be carefully considered, for it can bring real benefits”. (Awake! Nov. 22, 1974, p.28)"
</font>Take care.
Andyman: