1. On the Daily Show with Jon Stewart last night, he illustrated a perfect example where Bush puts his priorities. Remember the tsunami? Why didn't Bush leave Crawford, TX to come back to DC to sign a bill to give assistance to those countries affected, but cut short his vacation this time to sign a bill over a single human that he has never met?
2. Terri didn't have a living will, power of attorney, etc. prepared beforehand. This makes her husband the de facto caregiver and guardian. If she were to have preferred that her parents take over in case of something such as this, one, she should have said so in a will, and two, she shouldn't have married her husband. She made the decision to marry him, it wasn't forced upon her. This just shows how everyone today needs to plan for the future without putting it off. Your *life* is in the care of your closest kin, including by marriage.
3. The money. At this point, no one knows the motives of either the husband or the parents. It could quite possibly be that the parents never liked the husband and he never liked them. If it's personal, that is their problem, not Congress.' After all these years, I'm sure both parties are drooling over the payout. If you were to take away the money aspect, I wonder where everyone would stand then? Threatening to cut a baby in half comes to mind.... I would love to hear either party say that they would give all money received to a charity. That would be the truest indicator.
4. This entire political drama is just disgusting. Why on earth the government would get involved in this case is beyond me. A rallying of the religious right? Sounds about right to me.