People ... get laid. It happens. Get over it. It’s none of your damn business - you're missing the point entirely.
People who choose to be sexually active should also be responsible.
^^^ What about this is so hard to understand?!
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
People ... get laid. It happens. Get over it. It’s none of your damn business - you're missing the point entirely.
People who choose to be sexually active should also be responsible.
^^^ What about this is so hard to understand?!
so, emma raducanu was knocked out of wimbledon yesterday.. she won her first round match, and lost in the second round.. i wasn't expecting her to win the whole tournament, but i did kinda hope she would make it through the first week.. so, what's going on with her?
is she not fully fit?.
or maybe her body is not yet ready for the full pro circuit?
So, Emma Raducanu was knocked out of Wimbledon yesterday.
She won her first round match, and lost in the second round.
I wasn't expecting her to win the whole tournament, but I did kinda hope she would make it through the first week.
So, what's going on with her?
Is she not fully fit?
Or maybe her body is not yet ready for the full pro circuit? - TBH, I smell bullshit with this point. Her body was just fine with having to win an extra 3 matches at the US Open, then she went on to win the whole thing. Tennis is not a contact sport, we're not talking the dangers of amateur boxers turning pro, here.
So, injury problems aside, there could be something wrong with her set-up. She was way too quick to ditch the coach who helped her win last year's US Open, in my view.
She should have stuck with that guy until the partnership reached its logical conclusion. Changing coaches willy nilly is not a good idea, let's be honest.
I like Raducanu, she's from my hometown (Bromley). She went to Newstead Wood Girls' Grammar School, which literally backs onto the housing estate I grew up in. When I was a kid, me and my mates used to sneak onto Newstead Wood's tennis courts to play tennis, and onto the school's artificial hockey courts to play football.
Emma and I are both Tottenham Hotspur fans*, so that's something else we both have in common.
I want her to do well, but it seems there are still a few wrinkles that she needs to iron out, and iron out soon.
A talent such as hers is criminal to waste.
*
up to 30,000 people contracted hiv and hepatitis c in the 1970s and 80s after being given blood treatments or transfusions on the nhs.. thousands have since died.. it just goes to show there is no such thing as a sure thing.. the wts may be wrong about their blood doctrine, and their bible interpretation to justify it, and how they enforced the rules about it, but ultimately may be correct in claiming that "bloodless surgery" was a safer option medically.. canada also had a contaminated blood scandal, where 30,000 were infected with hepatitis c and hiv.. in other news, paying for blood from high-risk donors is a bad idea.
who knew?
well apparently the people behind the schemes did, and that's why they covered it up.. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-61929986.
This scandal is a complete disgrace.
And John Major's comments at the inquiry 'the victims had incredibly bad luck' is f**king disgusting.
Yes, ladies & gentlemen, it turns out that John Major wasn't one of the 'nice' PMs as we may have thought.
John Major is a total c**t.
press conference with satan and he takes more questions than joe biden.https://youtu.be/0li4uehuvtm
Saw this same vid on facebook the other day ... gotta love the Babylon Bee, lol.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
If it is true that 50 percent of all conceptions end in spontaneous abortion---or, a miscarriage---without the woman even realizing that she IS pregnant---then, who, or what---is responsible for that termination of the existence of a fetus? - nobody. Bad shit just happens sometime, that's all.
That's got little or nothing to do with irresponsible adults getting their rocks off then killing unborn babies.
What's your take on the January 6th hearings? - the Capitol riot was bad, so there deserves to be a hearing.
But the actual event wasn't as bad as the BLM riots. The rioters didn't kill anybody, and the damage done, though bad, was just a fraction of the cost of all the looting and buildings burnt down by BLM nutters.
BTW, Trump was acquitted of inciting the mob, as far as I can remember.
What I feel about it can be summed up in these words ... storm in a teacup.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
Personally i think it's pretty early - yeah, me too. Even if life does begin at conception, the zygote is just a cell. It has no nervous system, cannot feel pain or anything else. Very early in the pregnancy, the baby is just a clump of dividing cells, that's it.
Later on, the foetus can move, respond to its mother's voice, feel pain. Just look at that scan which someone posted a few pages ago in this thread. The scan at 12 weeks clearly shows a miniature human being.
Oh that is grotesque - if you think that's bad, how about this: a US woman called Lindsey Ellis deliberately got herself pregnant just so she could have an abortion and make a documentary about it. The documentary is apparently called The A Word. WTF is wrong with these people?!
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
One thing I will say: the beliefs of the liberal-left have little or no logic to them.
I saw a photo of an obviously pregnant woman who'd written 'not a human life yet' on her swollen belly. I can bet any money that that same woman would say 'I lost my baby' if she miscarried.
At least the right's view on this is logical - life begins at conception, so abortion is murdering the unborn baby. You can disagree with the right, but at least their beliefs have some kind of logic.
Just out of interest, if life doesn't begin at conception, when does it begin?
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
This is a very difficult topic to say the least.
It's obviously controversial, and the overturning of Roe v Wade is definitely divisive.
There is much to discuss, e.g. rape victims who get pregnant do deserve abortions, I totally agree with this point.
But let's be honest, the majority of women getting abortions aren't rape victims.
Boys and girls need good advice in their schooling and education - including sex education.
Here's a piece of advice that I've heard from someone else but it makes sense and so I'd give it to young women: only sleep with a man if you think he'd make a good father.
Liberals have been crying, hysterically saying that with this new ruling, women will be at the mercy of their sexual biology. And I say: bollocks! Adults should behave responsibly and be held responsible for their own behaviour.
The function of male and female bodies is to make babies, that's obvious.
Clearly, Homo sapiens is a sexually reproducing species, and people can learn this the easy way or the hard way.
i know there was a leak a few weeks back, but this really does seem to have come out of the blue.. the anomaly was the original decision.
it clearly had no basis in law or the constitution, and was a flimsy, ridiculous ruling.
plus the whole thing was based on a fraudulent case in the first place.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61928898.
It should be up to each individual woman to decide what she wants to do re abortions - but that was determined at federal level.
So, that had been made legal and determined by Federal authorities, not individual women.
BTW, it still is up to individual women to decide whether she has an abortion or not ...