Hey The Searcher!
Hmmm, I'm kinda still gonna call you out.....
From The Searchers third post in this thread:
I stand corrected and defer to your alertness. I should have said "many already share a hall and the few that don't, appear to be getting moved into other K.H.'s." New light provided.
Thanks for highlighting the error.
Really? 'many already share a hall and the few that don't' - Really? - sorry to disappoint
It appears that EVERY K.H. you listed in your opening post is shared between two or more congregations - actually, as I highlighted earlier in my previous post on this thread, on average EACH hall you listed is actually shared by 3.5 congregations.
Why didn't you list the London K.H.'s that
aren't shared, and are used by just one congregation?
the irony of usernames
Anyway, no bad feeiings ..... I'll even start you off.... you see, I'm a nice and helpful person
You see, and let's be clear about this, I'm not saying that all London congregations share their K.H.'s - some don't (see above).
Rather, I'm calling you out because I believe most people would have understood that your opening post and title was implying that the majority of the 35 London K.H.'s that you had listed - not just a couple but 35!! and all in London!! - had just one congregation meeting in them.
And therefore - quite understandably and quite easily - that single congregation could be moved to a neighboring K.H. - hey! hey! - and free up real estate that could be - in your words - 'sacrificed for filthy lucre.'
Oh, and not forgetting the mysterious 'according to the org's website, various congregations will be moving in with other congregations, effective January 1st 2017' message that you haven't shown or provided a link to yet (or even a screen shot) ??