I can't believe Amazon.com is selling this trash.

by JeffT 71 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • Abaddon
    Abaddon

    Cassi

    No probs; it's not bad to be emotionally involved with a subject. I always miss out bits of a response when I feel intensely about a subject, as my mind moves faster than my fingers and stuff gets left out; the modifiers normally, like 'usually', or 'most', so a reasonable opinion becomes polarised.

    In general (not talking specifically to you Cassi) I'm really disappointed no-one else is interested in the wider issue of how our society deals with the sexuality of young people.

    Do people disagree with my opinion of how young people are portrayed in the media, or are they simply uncomfortable discussing it? Do people believe there is no difference in the vulnerability to abuse of an early teen who knows nothing about sex and one whose received decent sex education, or are they simply uncomfortable with teaching children about sex, or even talking about the issue?

    In my mind there is no diagreement with anyone here over the vital neccesity of protecting minors from sexual predators, or over the neccesity of ensuring such convicted offenders do not offend again.

    However, catching and imprisoning such people is not a real deterant to such people; they have sickness, moral or mental, that makes their desire overcome any fears of retribution.

    Therefore, unless we want this problem to affect the lives of our grandchildren in the same way as if affects the lives of our children, we have to look at other ways to protect young people.

    If someone grows up in a society where there is sexual prudery, widespread double standards, and a low standard of sex education, then they are conditioned not to talk about sex, are conflicted if someone treats them in a sexual fashion, as on one hand they may know it is wrong, but on the other hand its not so wrong if they see other young people being treated as a sex object on TV, and, perhaps worst of all, they are ignorant about their own sexuality and their own sexual rights.

    It is only by addressing such issues that we can hope children in the future will have greater protection from sexual predators. If we ignore these issues and go for the easy option of concentrating on the bad people, then the underlying issues that make it easier for these people to prey on our children will remain the same.

  • rem
    rem

    No Apologies,

    In this case they have made the conscious decision to distribute - and profit from - a publication that advocates and attempts to justify behavior that is morally reprehensible to 99.9999% of the general public, and is generally illegal in most parts of the world.

    Pretty sad argument because you forget the fact that Amazon has more to lose by keeping the publication available than by taking it down. It's not like they are not gonna make their numbers this quarter because they're selling this book! On the contrary, because so many people believe that only their version of free speech is appropriate Amazon will probably lose customers. So yes, they are making it available because of their charter in favor of free expression, which they have announced many times before when this subject has come up:

    "We believe that people have the right to choose their own reading material," she said. "Our goal is to support freedom of expression and to provide customers with the broadest selection possible so they can find, discover, and buy any title they might be seeking."

    Smith noted that "that selection includes some titles which most people, including employees of Amazon.com, may find distasteful or otherwise objectionable. However, Amazon.com believes it is censorship to make a book unavailable to our customers because we believe its message to be repugnant."

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29065%20

    rem

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit