The conclusion that you made, that is wrong, was this:
What you say [There has been a massive population explosion in the last couple of centuries due to modern health and sanitation, modern medicine, the Haber process, etc. Before that, population levels were relatively stable, even over millenia] is not correct.
It is just the other way around..." - Venus
You conclusion is the world's population was not stable and that we are not now seeing a massive increase in the world's population due to modern medicine, agriculture, engineering etc. You are wrong.
"...It is just the other way around..." - Venus
I will repeat that part of your post so there can be no more confusion on you part as to why I am saying you are wrong. My conclusion was soundly based on your own words. If you wrote incorrectly then you should reiterate your position so we can move forwards.
The rest of you latest post is just nonsense and blatant projection. Let's look at one nonsensical blathering of yours; referring to Richard Dawkins retweeting a satirical song you said:
"...he took it too personally the distress of which was too much that his brain suffered a stroke within 13 days..." - Venus
You offered up a newspaper article to back up this stupidness. Did you read the article you presented? I don't think you did because had you done so you would have seen Richard's response to his being dropped from a Conference due to this retweeting:
“De-platformed for tweeting an irrelevant joke song? Ah well, ‘Always look on the bright side of life.’ Incidentally, would Monty Python have been de-platformed for that? No, don’t be silly, Life of Brian was only satirising Christianity.” - Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins was 74 at the time of this 'mini stroke'. Yet again you take one fact and then form a conclusion that has no basis in reality.
You are quite the one Venus...