607 date of Jerusalems destruction

by benny 79 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    For this reason in order to construct a scheme of Chronology one needs to adopt a METHODOLOGY along with an INTERPRETATION of all of the data, historical and theological background.

    The WTS's dating chronology such as it was established is really set upon theological interpretation, being 70 years of desolation prior to Cyrus overtaking Babylon in 539 BCE..

    The fact is there is a discrepancy of about 21 years, confirmed from archeological findings, which confirms that the desolation was only about 47 years after the final destruction of Jerusalem ( 586 - 539 = 47 ) give or take a couple of years of flexibility to when the Jews actually returned to Jerusalem.

  • scholar
    scholar

    notsurewheretogo

    Eh? You need to do research mate, zero secular evidence.

    What about Josephus?

    scholar

  • scholar
    scholar

    Finkelstein

    The WTS's dating chronology such as it was established is really set upon theological interpretation, being 70 years of desolation prior to Cyrus overtaking Babylon in 539 BCE.

    True to some extent. The correct understanding of the 70 year period is crucial for not only WT Chronology but also any Chronology that is to be based on the Bible or OT.

    There is certainly a Gap of at least 20 Years but the Bible is quite clear that the seventy years was that and not 47 years so one should misrepresent history in that way.

    scholar

    The fact is there is a discrepancy of about 21 years, confirmed from archaeological findings, which confirms that the desolation was only about 47 years after the final destruction of Jerusalem ( 586 - 539 = 47 ) give or take a couple of years of flexibility to when the Jews actually returned to Jerusalem



  • scholar
    scholar

    coffy

    Incorrect. The date 607 is based on biblical and secular evidence and is in harmony with Biblical Theology. There is always a danger in accepting without criticism of academic consensus.

    scholar

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    Scholar believes in 607 BCE in spite of contrary physical evidence.

    The bible supports 586 in virtue of its information stating that Nebuchadnezzar's final destruction of Jerusalem in his 19th renal year and the actions by him toward Jerusalem prior to that final destruction.

  • scholar
    scholar

    Finkelstein

    Scholar believes in 607 because that is what the Bible supports and indicates and is validated by secular evidence which can be fine-tuned or adjusted in order to overcome the 20-year gap between NB Chronology and Bible Chronology.

    The dates 586 or 587 dates are impossible and fraudulent as both these dates do not consider the 70 years of desolation, exile and servitude which began in Neb's 18 th regnal /19th acc. years synchronised to Zedekiah's 11th year in Judah. QED

    scholar

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    Jeremiah 52

    The Fall of Jerusalem

    1Zedekiah was twenty-one years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem eleven years. His mother’s name was Hamutal daughter of Jeremiah; she was from Libnah. 2 He did evil in the eyes of the Lord, just as Jehoiakim had done. 3 It was because of the Lord’s anger that all this happened to Jerusalem and Judah, and in the end he thrust them from his presence.

    Now Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon.

    4 So in the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign, on the tenth day of the tenth month, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon marched against Jerusalem with his whole army. They encamped outside the city and built siege works all around it. 5 The city was kept under siege until the eleventh year of King Zedekiah.

    6 By the ninth day of the fourth month the famine in the city had become so severe that there was no food for the people to eat. 7 Then the city wall was broken through, and the whole army fled. They left the city at night through the gate between the two walls near the king’s garden, though the Babylonians[a] were surrounding the city. They fled toward the Arabah,[b] 8 but the Babylonian[c] army pursued King Zedekiah and overtook him in the plains of Jericho. All his soldiers were separated from him and scattered, 9 and he was captured.

    He was taken to the king of Babylon at Riblah in the land of Hamath, where he pronounced sentence on him. 10 There at Riblah the king of Babylon killed the sons of Zedekiah before his eyes; he also killed all the officials of Judah. 11 Then he put out Zedekiah’s eyes, bound him with bronze shackles and took him to Babylon, where he put him in prison till the day of his death.

    12 On the tenth day of the fifth month, in the nineteenth year of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, Nebuzaradan commander of the imperial guard, who served the king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem. 13 He set fire to the temple of the Lord, the royal palace and all the houses of Jerusalem. Every important building he burned down. 14 The whole Babylonian army, under the commander of the imperial guard, broke down all the walls around Jerusalem. 15 Nebuzaradan the commander of the guard carried into exile some of the poorest people and those who remained in the city, along with the rest of the craftsmen[d] and those who had deserted to the king of Babylon. 16 But Nebuzaradan left behind the rest of the poorest people of the land to work the vineyards and fields.

  • scholar
    scholar

    Finkelstein

    Your point?

    scholar

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    Archeological findings plus biblical chronology both support 586 BCE as Jerusalem's final destruction.

    Daniel's prophecy was mythological bullshit, mind you it was not the only mythological bullshit expressed by the ancient Hebrews and placed in the bible.

  • Rattigan350
    Rattigan350

    The Time Stone created an alternate timeline on this one.

    If people are just going to conclude "Daniel's prophecy was mythological bullshit", then what is your point?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit