This thread is for proof that God exists (page 32)

Fisherman

Proof that God exists does not depend upon the evidence, but on the rules of evidence, and ultimately upon who is trying the case -who has the final say.

cofty

That is a moot point unless you are able to provide evidence for anybody to judge.

Fisherman

That is a moot point since you are unable to provide evidence for anybody to judge

It is not a moot point, it is a qualifying condition. And since you(s) got to determine that my presents is not not satisfying, there is nothing more for me to say or show is there?

cofty

Yes you could break with your habit so far and actually present objective evidence for the existence of the god of Jesus.

Right, just as I stated the above condition: "Proof that God exists does not depend upon the evidence, but on the rules of evidence, and ultimately upon who is trying the case -who has the final say." which is not a moot point as you erroneous asserted. Correct?

JRK

I have no proof so far, but keep hashing it out.

JK

cofty

Proof that God exists does not depend upon the evidence - Fishy

That deserves a prize for the most lame contribution by a christian apologist.

talesin

g-d believers
eh?
Why not type god?

Cofty, great question, and I'm happy to explain. It's a way of saying "I do not accept your false concepts", an old hippy atheist way of peacefully saying "God? what God? No, it's just a non-word. G-d."

I'm not being facetious, that's the truth.

My Earth Festival organizer friends dubbed me "The Antichrist". I kid you not!

talesin

We actually subscribe to the same way of thinking (science), but have different ways of communicating and an hella big CLASH. That does not have to remain a problem, if mutual respect could ensue.

ie, olive branch extended, which doesn't mean we shall always agree, but we can agree to be civil and follow debating rules when we *do* clash

Fisherman

That deserves a prize for the most lame contribution by a christian apologist.

Ok. But my statement stands.

And your assertion is false, Right?

Proof that God exists does not depend upon the evidence - Fishy

You misrepresent what I said by taking part of my statement out of context and posting only part of what I posted.

Right?

This thread is for proof that God exists

Share this