OK fine. This is what really happened. Bush only needed to become President to fulfill his agenda of going to war with Iraq for oil. (Proven by the amount of time it took to happen after the election So, after he had his brother in Florida fix the votes, insuring his win, he arranged for his appointed cabinet helpers to fly planes into the Pentagon, the Twin Towers and purposely miss the White house because, not only is that where he lives, but it would also make room to set the stage for the faked struggle that took place on the last plane before it went down. Oh, that's right, all the passengers on the last plane were all in on it too. And the people that piloted the planes into the buildings, they were just pretending to be suicide bombers. Yep, Bush promised them they would really go places if they did this for him. Why was this necessary? Bush new he had to do something catastrophic enough to send all Americans into enough of an outrage over the death of thousands of innocent people that they would eagerly be on his side. Furthermore, this would also be devastating and bold enough to incite the rest of the world to either join him in his mission or at least consider joining him for fear of being next if they didn’t. In addition, all the late night Letterman and Leno jokes about Bushes “less then average Presidential intelligence” is all a cover-up and a deterrent to keep us off track, so they are in on it ass well. He did manage to pull it all off in about 12 months give or take a month. He is the mastermind to beat all masterminds. Now that’s settled..
So, what REALLY happened on September 11, a.k.a. the unknowns...???
by reporter 145 Replies latest social current
-
-
Mr. Kim
According to the U. S. Government, the really "bad" things are GOING to happen. The question is when. The Gov. said that there WILL be a WMD used in the US and the only question is when? They (the Government) sure seem to know a lot of details....I wonder why?
-
jelly
Honestly, I have been around this board in one form or another since the beginning. I can tell you at this point this board is the worst it has ever been. If this DBS sucked anymore, we would have to make up a new word for its suck like qualities. The phrase completely sucks just does not cover the depth this board has sunk.
- Mindless innuendo
- Cut and paste from idiot sources
- 95% of the decent posters with something to say an the ability to argue it gone
Terry -
seawolf
95% of the decent posters with something to say an the ability to argue it gone
Who are the %5 that are left?
-
Jayson
You Might Be A Republican If... You think "proletariat" is a type of cheese.
You've named your kids "Deduction one" and "Deduction two"
You've tried to argue that poverty could be abolished if people were just allowed to keep more of their minimum wage.
You've ever referred to someone as "my (insert racial or ethnic minority here) friend"
You've ever tried to prove Jesus was a capitalist and opposed to welfare.
You're a pro-lifer, but support the death penalty.
You think Huey Newton is a cookie.
The only union you support is the Baseball Players, because heck, they're richer than you.
You think you might remember laughing once as a kid.
You once broke loose at a party and removed your neck tie.
You call mall rent-a-cops "jack-booted thugs."
You've ever referred to the moral fiber of something.
You've ever uttered the phrase, "Why don't we just bomb the sons of bitches."
You've ever said, "I can't wait to get into business school."
You've ever called a secretary or waitress "Tootsie."
You answer to "The Man."
You don't think "The Simpsons" is all that funny, but you watch it because that Flanders fellow makes a lot of sense.
You fax the FBI a list of "Commies in my Neighborhood."
You don't let your kids watch Sesame Street because you accuse Bert and Ernie of "sexual deviance."
You scream "Dit-dit-ditto" while making love.
You've argued that art has a "moral foundation set in Western values."
When people say "Marx," you think "Groucho."
You've ever yelled, "Hey hippie, get a haircut."
You think Birkenstock was that radical rock concert in 1969.
You argue that you need 300 handguns, in case a bear ever attacks your home.
Vietnam makes a lot of sense to you.
You point to Hootie and the Blowfish as evidence of the end of racism in America.
You've ever said civil liberties, schmivil schmiberties.
You've ever said "Clean air? Looks clean to me."
You've ever called education a luxury.
You look down through a glass ceiling and chuckle.
You wonder if donations to the Pentagon are tax-deductable.
You came of age in the '60s and don't remember Bob Dylan.
You own a vehicle with an "Ollie North: American Hero" sticker.
You're afraid of the liberal media."
You ever based an argument on the phrase, "Well, tradition dictates...."
You ever told a child that Oscar the Grouch "lives in a trash can because he is lazy and doesn't want to contribute to society."
You've ever urged someone to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, when they don't even have shoes.
You confuse Lenin with Lennon. -
searchfothetruth
Sally Regenhard, left, and Monica Gabrielle, whose son and husband, respectively, died in the World Trade Center attacks, attend a public hearing on the attacks before a joint House-Senate Intelligence Committees hearing in September 2002.Bush's 9/11 coverup?
Family members of victims of the terror attacks say the White House has smothered every attempt to get to the bottom of the outrageous intelligence failures that took place on its watch.- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric BoehlertJune 18, 2003 | For family members of those who died on Sept. 11, last week brought a rare chance to meet face-to-face with a man who's become a symbol of their dissatisfaction -- FBI director Robert Mueller. The bureau had quietly invited several dozen family members to Washington to hear a presentation on the war on terrorism, but for the small band of husbands, wives and parents who successfully lobbied Congress last year for an independent 9/11 commission to investigate the attacks, it was a chance to ask some of the troubling questions that they have about that day.
They weren't simply queries about the national security collapse that occurred on 9/11, and how a hijacked plane, flying hundreds of miles off course, was able to dive-bomb untouched into the Pentagon a full hour after the World Trade Center had already been attacked twice. Or how more than a dozen terrorists were able to enter America illegally and then live here undetected for weeks and months, and why U.S. intelligence sources failed to piece together significant clues that emerged in advance of the attack.
Family advocates also wanted to know why the government -- and specifically the Bush administration -- has been so reluctant to find answers to any of the obvious questions about what went wrong that day, why so little has been fixed, and why virtually nobody has accepted any responsibility for the glaring failures.
While the administration of President George W. Bush is aggressively positioning itself as the world leader in the war on terrorism, some families of the Sept. 11 victims say that the facts increasingly contradict that script. The White House long opposed the formation of a blue ribbon Sept. 11 commission, some say, and even now that panel is underfunded and struggling to build momentum. And, they say, the administration is suppressing a 900-page congressional study, possibly out of fear that the findings will be politically damaging to Bush.
