Fur is beneficial for survival. Evolution stripped humans of this advantage?
good question - as humans we like to tell just so stories, if we didn't how would we find any kind of meaning in our lives.
science provides explanations and not just so stories. If an article focuses on beneficial and advantageous selections then it is likely to be a just so story - good for the soul but not robust as an explanation. In this case we would need to look for words and sentences like probably, it could have happened like this etc. no mention is made of non adaptive processes that confer no advantages
mutations or slightly deleterious mutations
these often work in tandem with natural selection but are often ignored probably because they do not have adaptive storytelling power. I would at least ask peeps to lay off promoting such stories as FACTS writ large
edit: please note that I used soul metaphorically - any spelling mistakes are not intentionally made so as to. mislead. hope that covers everything that might upset peoples bullshit meters.