What are the biggest holes in evolution? (page 7)

Makemeanunbeliever

Evolution vs creation is singlehandedly the stupidest conversations on this forum. NO one can prove or disprove either and a measure of faith in scientists or a creator is necessary. This debate will rage on till Armageddon, whether that be by mankinds destruction of his environment and each other or by a creator.

Newsflash, it wont be solved on this forum now or ever.

G'day

MakeMe

cofty

NO one can prove or disprove either and a measure of faith in scientists or a creator is necessary.

Creationism has been proven to be wrong beyond all reasonable doubt.

It is an irrefutable fact that every living thing evolved from a common ancestor.

Only the willfully ignorant and superstitious deny it.

it wont be solved on this forum now or ever

It has already been resolved. The fact that you don't understand the subject doesn't change reality.

slimboyfat

Science might work petty well in practice, but does it work in theory? That's the issue we should be addressing.

LoveUniHateExams

The sterility of crossbreeding in animals.

It's actually not that simple. For example, coydogs (coyote x dog hybrids) show decreased fertility, whereas wolfdogs (wolf x dog hybrids) show normal fertility.

This strongly suggests that wolves are more closely related to dogs than coyotes are.

Please read further in 'Wolves - Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation' (Chicago Press).

Fisherman

I do not think that it is possible to disprove evolution. Anything seeming not to conform to evolution can be shown to reconcile some way, and even if it can't, that doesn't invalidate evolution, it only means that aspect of the evolutionary process is not understood. So, I think that it is a waste of time to attempt to invalidate evolution. It is not known for sure if evolution is the case even though it is widely viewed as a fact from the position that it is believed that the degree of evolution not being the case is almost null. From my experience it is hilarious watching amateurs proving or disproving it. They just do not know. You can sit in a classroom and learn it or in a court room and be convinced -but you were not there and did not see what happened. If you can measure evolution, case closed. But you can't, you are required to believe that it is a fact.

LoveUniHateExams

@Fisherman

Evolution is accepted by the scientific community because it is testable and has lots of evidence supporting it.

Is the statement "God created life" testable? How would you or anyone else go about testing that statement? Is there any supporting evidence?

*****

Have you read on the different canine hybrids? Fertility levels vary in these hybrids, shedding light on the relatedness of various canines.

bohm

Evolution of basic cellular machinery; no direct evidence and indirect evidence such as genetics and molecular homology has been degraded by billions of years of subsequent evolution.

Fisherman

Is the statement "God created life" testable? How would you or anyone else go about testing that statement? Is there any supporting evidence?

Not scientific physical evidence of the kind that can be shown -but nevertheless, remarkable, solid, striking, convincing evidence that can be measured by an individual. Without such evidence a person just does not know for sure.

LoveUniHateExams

Not scientific physical evidence of the kind that can be shown ...

But that's the only type of evidence that exists - you know that, right?

Mephis

Well, Your Honor, we have plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.

What are the biggest holes in evolution?

Share this