Ruby, sometimes a little learning is dangerous.
You take the findings of research on religiosity and improved mental health wellbring and apply it across religious groups in general - and you fail to consider whether such a general finding can be applied to specified religious groups, even a high-control group such as JWs.
You extrapolate from the finding and virtually conclude all religion must be good for adherents. You then tell another poster to get real about the finding. Do you not see how literal minded you have been? Because religiosity may have health benefits does not therefore mean all religiosity has those benefits.
With all due respect, you have drawn an incredibly long bow to make a dubious point. And you consistently fail to respond to very specific points posters have raised such as the calibre of people attracted to JW organization and anecdotal reports that strongly suggest mental health problems and suicidal behaviours are occurring In local congregations.
Whilst actual statistics of mental health disorders on specific religious groups are unknown and we cannot make comparisons between groups (e.g., which one has the higher rate of mental health problems, etc.,, we can still observe what is happening in specific groups - especially when individuals identify as affiliated with a named group.
Conversely,there is an absence of evidence that the reported health benefits of religiosity extend equally to all groups irrespective of the leadership structure and stresses within high-control groups.