what you spout out dubla is regurgitated BS from politicians, there's nothing solid about that.
i was specifically talking about the quotes i provided from the iaea....and yes they are solid testimonies, or are you calling into question the opinions of the iaea now as well? boy, theres no such thing as an "expert" in your eyes, is there? unless of course its someone talking of fairy tales and secret cover-ups.
and links to what so-called 'respected individuals', means we have to believe whatever they say does it, even when they cant back up what they say?
to suggest that publishing this material if it is 'a how to' manual, would allow rogue countries to build nukes is completely absurd.
personally, i think the iaea is qualified to make the judgement on that.....and id imagine that the reason there are 136 member states of the iaea is because they also believe the experts are qualified in their field. you can reject it as "absurd", but it wont make it so.
a bit about the iaea staff:
C. The staff shall include such qualified scientific and technical and other personnel as may be required to fulfill the objectives and functions of the Agency. The Agency shall be guided by the principle that its permanent staff shall be kept to a minimum.
D. The paramount consideration in the recruitment and employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be to secure employees of the highest standards of efficiency, technical competence, and integrity. Subject to this consideration, due regard shall be paid to the contributions of members to the Agency and to the importance of recruiting the staff on as wide a geographical basis as possible.
but of course, these so-called experts dont know as much about building a nuclear bomb as you do, right? im sure youre more qualified to say whether or not those pages should be released to the public, i cant figure out why they just didnt consult you instead.
do you think that these nations dont know how to do it already?
oh, of course they do....everyone knows its as simple as sending in 3 proofs of purchase from any kellogs brand cereal to get the full nuclear instruction manual.......allow four to six weeks for delivery.
you're the one who's always talking about this crap. your posts span over 22 pages, and you dont humour, you just bore the pants off people. reading your posts is like watching CNN.
make it 23....and i never claimed to be some sort of exciting poster. again, facts and real sources cant compete with your conspiracy websites on the excitement scale. here you are again crying about boredom. the last time i checked, no one is forcing you to read my posts.....yet here you are, you cant drag yourself away, and you just have to keep replying. whether or not you like my style of posting is right around dead last on my list of "things to worry about", but i do appreciate your input nonetheless.....consider it noted.
you cant prove anything, so give it a rest.
and you can prove just as much....yet youre still here, and youre not "giving it a rest", are you? again, no one is forcing you to read or contribute to this thread. youve got the freedom of choice, so if im so bothersome to you, use it.
but no, anyone who comes on here with different opinion to yours has to go through the dubla treatment of the endless slime of official stories and quotes with no proof.
actually, thats the farthest thing from the truth. in fact, theres been a bunch of posters on here who disagree with me that i havent even addressed. again ill remind you, it was YOU who confronted ME on the issue....but i guess i was supposed to ignore you.?. ill keep that in mind next time. it does seem quite curious though, that youve felt this way about my posts, and have been bored out of your mind, yet you still felt the need to strike up a discussion with me..? hmm.....strange way of showing your disgust with someone.