A thread: "Moon, laws & mathematics", an astronomy version of "Science that proves that God exists", and in coming back to your moon numerical proposal, : Most planetary mass rotates at 10 hours, not 24, like the Earth, but if the angular momentum of the Earth/Moon system is considered, it evens out, what ever smacked the earth to separate the moon, hit just right to have them rotate at the same rate as the sun. In golf, that's a "hole in one" all made possible by the conditions in the beginning that came out of the energetic, bubbling "nothing". so, the sun, and we rotate, conceive at the same cadence, is that not amazing?
Sun,moon, earth and mathematics .
by atomant 136 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

prologos

A Ha
Yes, it is not amazing.

Viviane
Most planetary mass rotates at 10 hours, not 24
Mercury is about 59 days, Venus is 243 days, Mars is 23, Jupiter is almost 10, Saturn is 10, Uranus is 16, Neptune is 16, Pluto is 6 days. So no, most don't rotate at 10 hours.

prologos
Viviane: "Most planetary mass rotates at 10 hours, not 24 : no most don't rotate
with due respect: Saturn rotation 10 hrs, at 10 AU distance, 21 % of all the planetary mass.
Jupiter rotates at 10 hrs at ~ 5 AU distance 71 % of the total planetary mass; ergo: 92 % of all the planetary mass rotates at 10 hrs, in angular momentum terms also the Earth Moon system. A stabilizing feature, when you consider we rotate ~in lunation in sync with the sun. harmonizing both in planetary mass and solar mass movement.PS: and the delicate tissue  thin ring system of Saturn in that 10 hour regime should remind us how such conforming stability is rewarding. and: some of the planets had major disruptions, tidal effects in their history, Mercury, Venus, (tied to the sun) Uranus tilted past the vertical. it's a democracy, majority rule, you conform. you prosper.

Viviane
with due respect: Saturn rotation 10 hrs, at 10 AU distance, 21 % of all the planetary mass.
Jupiter rotates at 10 hrs at ~ 5 AU distance 71 % of the total planetary mass; ergo: 92 %of all the planetary mass rotates at 10 hrs, in angular momentum terms also the Earth Moon system.Respect aside, Jupiter rotates every 9.925 hours, Saturn at 10.6733. expressed using percent of mass rotation per hour using your numbers, we see that MOST planetary mass is rotating at 9.288143 hours, so still, no, most planetary mass doesn't rotate at 10 hours.
At least you've admitted you cherry pick things you don't understand to support your word salad numerology that even you can't explain.

prologos
V: " Jupiter rotates every 9.925 hours, Saturn at 10.6733.
That is the angular momentum coming out of the solar system's contracting disk. the scattering from the mean of ~ 10, +/ .75% you will find in most scientific observation data. If you get your kicks out of quibbling in 3/4 percentage points, rather than contributing positively , we all should feel sorry for you.

Viviane
That is the angular momentum coming out of the solar system's contracting disk. the scattering from the mean of ~ 10, +/ .75% you will find in most scientific observation data. If you get your kicks out of quibbling in 3/4 percentage points, rather than contributing positively , we all should feel sorry for you.
I will find what, exactly? Scattering of what, exactly? What disk, exactly?
And i get my kicks from promoting good science beating up pseudo science. I think we can All agree that good science helps, snake oil should be junked, and you've already admitted you cherry pick things you don't understand to support whatever you're promoting (but can't explain) as your world view. And you're getting it wrong consistently.
Now who's quibbling? And learn how math works.

shepherdless
Hi prologs and atomant, can you examine and let us know if there is anything we can learn about the following fascinating observations about the Washington Monument by Martin Gardiner?
[I]f one looks up the facts about the Washington Monument in the World Almanac, he will find considerable fiveness. Its height is 555 feet and 5 inches. The base is 55 feet square, multiplied by 60 (or five times the number of months in a year) it gives 3,300, which is the exact weight of the capstone in pounds. Also, the word "Washington" has exactly ten letters (two times five). And if the weight of the capstone is multiplied by the base, the result is 181,500a fairly close approximately of the speed of light in miles per second. If the base is measured with a "monument foot," which is slightly smaller than the standard foot, its side comes to 56 1/2 feet. This times 33,000 yields a figure even closer to the speed of light.
(Quote by Martin Gardener, in his book "Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science", 1957)

prologos
Sl: "figure even closer to the speed of light.
ok I bite on that. Of course, as cofty would say: "bollocks". The builders had enough trouble putting it together, to worry about "c" ratios; but if you could establish from data that increments in real world structures, in dynamics, have ratios that conform to a "speedoflight" related pattern, you could be on to something. Since even gravity's changes, are believed to propagate at c, many measurements are also representing wave length, distance , frequency values. Kepler mined the data of Brahe, and similarly, finding any pattern based on c could reveal a [standing] wave or resonance background. The coincident, that the diameter of the Earth's orbit is ~ 1000 light seconds just invites such analysis. that is why looking at the cosmos, rather than Washington's needly could be monumental.

Twitch
How would such coincidences be monumental?