Critique of Chemical Evolution

by Vidqun 53 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  EasyPrompt

  😆
• 

  EasyPrompt

  I read what you write. You care, that's why you're here.
• 

  MeanMrMustard

  @EP:

  
  
• 

  EasyPrompt

  @MMM:

  ☺️

  

  
  

  
  

  @Cofty -

  Know your roots.

  
  

  If biological evolution is your god, then Ernst Haeckel is one of your racist founding fathers. The hominid tree as we know it taught today in schools entwines much of its root system from this guy's work:

  
  

  https://www.mauritius-images.com/en/asset/ME-PI-1871836_mauritius_images_bildnummer_06630943_racist-evolutionary-theory-published-by-e-haeckel-1868-this-'great-chain-of-being-of-race'-portrays-an-evolutionary-chain-running-from-monkeys-to-humans-in-order-of-the-racial-and-national-perferences-of-the-publishers-the-heads-pictured-were-supposed-to-represent-from-top-to-bottom-and-left-to-right-'indo-german-chinese-fuegian-australian-negro-african-negro-tasmanian-gorilla-chimpanzee-orang-gibbon-proboscis-monkey-and-mandrill-'-the-naturalist-ernst-haeckel-%25281834---1919%2529-was-a-german-biologist-naturalist-philosopher-physician-professor-and-artist-who-discovered-described-and-named-thousands-of-new-species-mapped-a-genealogical-tree-relating-all-life-forms-and-coined-many-terms-in-biology-including-anthropogeny-ecology-phylum-phylogeny-and-the-kingdom-protista-haeckel-promoted-and-popularized-charles-darwin's-work-in-germany-though-he-and-darwin-did-not-always-agree-haeckel's-racist-views-though-not-exceptional-for-the-time-were-incorporated-into-his-scientific-work-this

  
  

  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982219314368#:~:text=It%20was%20Haeckel%20who%20crucially,Darwinian%20biological%20anthropology%20as%20well.

  
  

  https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/0012-9623-94.3.222

  
  

  The biological evolutionary model is neither scientific nor flattering. Those who uphold it dishonor themselves, their fellow humans, and their maker.

  
  

  Variation within a species accounts for the differences in skeletal compositions between humans. The fragmentary fossilized remains of animals miscategorized as "ancient hominids" are in actuality non-humans, not some mutating evolutionary link.

  
  

  Haeckel saw what he wanted to see. He didn't have evidence to back up his theories. He twisted the evidence to fit his theory. It's the same thing the GB do with the scriptures. Evolutionary "scientists" today build on the false foundations of the evolutionary "scientists" of the past, in the same way that the GB builds on the false foundation of CT Russell.

  
  

  All belief systems built on cracked foundations will fall in time.