July 2014 WT cracks down on apostate debates and 'dance parties'

by EndofMysteries 87 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • EndofMysteries
    EndofMysteries

    In the July 2014 study WT article titled "Jehovah's People "Renouce Unrighteousness".

    Par 9 and 10

    9. How did “foolish and ignorant debates” affect the early Christian congregation?

    9 God’s Word gives specific advice concerning the types of unrighteousness that Christians must renounce or reject. For instance, in the immediate context of 2 Timothy 2:19, we find that Paul tells Timothy “not to fight about words” and to “reject empty speeches.”(Read 2 Timothy 2:14, 16, 23.) Some members of the congregation were promoting apostate teachings. Also, it appears that others were introducing controversial ideas. Even if the latter were not directly unscriptural, they were divisive. They resulted in bickering and arguing over words, creating a spiritually unhealthy atmosphere. Hence, Paul stressed the need to “reject foolish and ignorant debates.”

    10. How should we respond when confronted with apostasy?

    10 Today, Jehovah’s people are not often confronted with apostasy within the congregation. Still, when exposed to unscriptural teachings, regardless of the source, we must decisively reject them. It would be unwise to engage in debates with apostates, whether in person, by responding to their blogs, or by any other form of communication. Even when the intention is to help the individual, such conversation would be contrary to the Scriptural direction we just considered. Rather, as Jehovah’s people, we completely avoid, yes reject, apostasy.

    then on dance parties parties

    19. How have some today acted with decisiveness to protect themselves from spiritual dangers?

    19 Some who had problems with alcohol before becoming Witnesses have made the personal choice to abstain from alcoholic beverages altogether. Others avoid certain types of entertainment that are not in themselves wrong but that can fuel personal moral weaknesses. (Ps. 101:3) For example, before becoming a Witness, one brother enjoyed the immoral atmosphere of the dance parties he frequented. But after learning the truth, he has completely avoided dancing even at Witness gatherings for fear of awakening improper desires or thoughts from his past. Of course, Christians are not required to abstain totally from alcohol, dancing, or other things that are not wrong in themselves. We are all expected, however, to take decisive and thorough action to protect ourselves from spiritual dangers.

  • RubaDub
    RubaDub

    "one brother ........"

    Well, if "one brother" did it, it must be good.

    Rub a Dub

  • EndofMysteries
    EndofMysteries

    If you read between the lines what they are really saying by those stupid examples is, "all 'spiritual' JW's will avoid dancing and dance parties and anything else that can possibly be fun. Those who are known to frequent those should be marked as unspiritual"

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    O my God they really are a bunch of fun hating grumpy old men on the Governing Body:

    For example, before becoming a Witness, one brother enjoyed the immoral atmosphere of the dance parties he frequented. But after learning the truth, he has completely avoided dancing even at Witness gatherings for fear of awakening improper desires or thoughts from his past.Of course, Christians are not required to abstain totally from alcohol, dancing, or other things that are not wrong in themselves. We are all expected, however, to take decisive and thorough action to protect ourselves from spiritual dangers.

    So give up dancing and alcohol even if the scriptures don't require it, but the old codgers called the Governing Body don't like it and don't forget no Higher Education or else your playing with the Devil's fire. Look at all the phobias they are passing around to the rank and file by printing this shit. What a bunch fun hating psychos make up the GB.

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Yep! The Ol' GB can speculate and make up all kinds of stuff. Heck, they are the only ones who can even interpret the Bible! I notice they don't define apostasy much anymore. They can't really be too specific, it might cause some JW brain cells to come online. So they have to be nebulous. In the end, anything that is not what the GB says, is apostasy. The say apostasy is saying anything contrary to the Bible, but since they tell you what it means...you get the idea.

    DD

  • EndofMysteries
    EndofMysteries

    " others were introducing controversial ideas. Even if the latter were not directly unscriptural" - by that statement they are confirming that apostates arguments may be fully scriptual but it goes against what the GB teach. So it's not looking for their own follower and twisting the scriptures with lies but even scriptual ideas that go against the GB are apostate.

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    Still, when exposed to unscriptural teachings, regardless of the source, we must decisively reject them

    I guess they mean ideas that differ from the current WT thinking, whether it is unscriptural or not. It is easy to achieve unity if you get everybody to always agree with YOU and brook no dissent.

  • Brainfloss
    Brainfloss

    Quoted from above:

    Still, when exposed to unscriptural teachings, regardless of the source, we must decisively reject them.

    If only the R&f would follow this sound advice.

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Articles like that are designed to shut down the ability to reason and to mark as "spiritually weak", those who use that ability or attempt to awaken that ability in others.

    DD

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    "It would be unwise to engage in debates with apostates, whether in person, by responding to their blogs, or by any other form of communication."

    Ramping it up and closing the loopholes. Pic on p. 15.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit