vivian, I can not be 100% wrong when your own charts [ thank you], show Titius bode is 80% right, from Mercury to Uranus
Correct, you could not be 100% more wrong.
and my modification makes it 1005 right by applying a different ruler to the same UNCHANGING DATA. and the augmented rules are: minimum orbital difference is .3 AU a 3 in the bode scheme.and 9.6 AU maximum difference in orbit diameter.
Sorry, this doesn't even approach making sense. Can you rephrase in actual sentences without completely changing what you wrote in the past? The numbers you give now match the math I corrected for you but still aren't a law because they are 100% descriptive, not predictive. Nor do they explain your failure to read a chart.
while Pluto fits the the doubling outer orbit reach of Bode
No. No it doesn't You can't just say it, you still have to show math, baby!
while Pluto fits the the doubling outer orbit reach of Bode
Observation and me showing you how to do math, so far. You weren't even close to that prior and the Bode-Titius hypothesis was off by >95%.
!AU=99 light seconds .3 AU= 149.5 light seconds 1/2 of the solar 5 minutes pulsation, the small orbit diameter difference.
It's actually jus t over 149.7 light seconds. You're getting closer, though!
Balls in solar array. spaced out in doubling distances. conforming all the laws these balls.
Still a negative on that. Bode-Titius is still a giant fail and your math even more. However, if it help you to learn, please keep stealing mine! So far my lady balls are still beating yours!