OK Here is what I found at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6919401.ece in 2009
Harley Burford, minister at the Forest Hill Jehovah’s Witnesses services, said: “They were a lovely family.
“He was a Jehovah’s Witness at one time but is not an active member any more, unlike his wife who he used to bring to the meetings.”
Buford is the same JW who in an earlier post here was quoted as being the one to help his JW wife move out of Bufords's hose.
1. Here is my guess on a couple of things. The WTS wants desperately to distance themselves from this person. They don't usually get involved in moving JW wives out of their husband's home. In fact the usual counsel is to stay and be a submissive wife. And maybe if you had been giving him sex he wouldn't have been out raping people.
2. They didn't dsay he wasn't one of them. They say he was "inactive" meaning he must have at one time been baptized. They also don't say he was "no longer a JJW" so at least at theat time he must have still been one. If they DFed him for adultery based on the rapes we know that if Grant were to go to the elders and "repent" they would let him back in.