Is it true? The WTS will not disfellowship anymore?

by heyfea 22 Replies latest jw friends

  • RubaDub
    RubaDub
    Actually I think they would be throwing away their hole card

    Panzer ...

    I think I addressed the "hole" card thing above.

    Rub a Dub

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    I can only imagine it would a word game. Nothing dramatic like that changes overnight, and if there really was a change, it would be in name only

  • heyfea
    heyfea

    If the WTS only changed the type of announcement, like saying so and so is no long a JW, but still require that the r & f shun these individuals, then, the end result for the people on both sides is the same. Only the WTS might benefit from this. Gosh! They are prime evil!

  • flipper
    flipper

    HEYFEA stated, " They are prime evil. " You certainly have that correct

  • Olin Moyles Ghost
    Olin Moyles Ghost

    Not true. JWs still DF people. A few years back, they changed the announcement to "XYZ is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses." But this was not a substantive change (more of a "lipstick on a pig" sort of thing). There has been no change in JW disfellowshipping policy.

  • crazycate
    crazycate

    I think someone is just slow to catch up to the wording that's been different for some time now. It's a legal thing. Saying "so-and-so is no longer one of JWs" implies that they weren't kicked out but rather chose by their actions or words that they no longer wanted to belong.

    Cate

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    The Watch Tower is fun for me to watch. Every decision they make, I categorize the reason for the change . . . Is it a decision to benefit business? Or is it a religious decision concerning faith?

    Most are obvious, like the voting policy.

  • orangefatcat
    orangefatcat

    If that was the case then I want to have my disfellowshipping recinded. In fact I wrote a letter to the governing body telling them in plain english that if they fornicated with the UN for 10 years and I only did one act and was sorry only unto God then why shouldn't they allow me back in the organization just so I can see my sisters.

    That letter is somewhere in my archives.

    If someone wants to look it up and post it I don't mind in the least.

    Orangefatcat.

  • Homerovah the Almighty
    Homerovah the Almighty

    If that is true they really are worried about keeping membership.

    The suggestion of them marking people is laughable and not to be taken seriously.

    I don't personally see this happening, not unless there is sever decline in attendees.

  • Mickey mouse

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit