Warren Schroeder from Bethel on Freddy, Kline and the apostate books!

by Dogpatch 501 Replies latest jw friends

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    I was naive too. Was the pressrom on the 6 floor?

    Does anyone remmeber Minor Buzby from OK. He went back and forth with the electric pallet jack from the preesroom to the bindery?

  • Gamaliel
    Gamaliel

    Tom,

    Since I worked in Photoplate for a few years and did several pieces of art for the Art Department, I'd have to concur with you. Granted there may have been some artists before I was there or after I left who managed to slip something in to make their mark, but I never saw it attempted on purpose from 1977 to 1980. And I think it would have been even more difficult in the following years after 1980. They still had some of the same people behind the the cameras for years after I was there, and I know how difficult it would have been to slip something like this past Brother Robinson or ANY of the others for that matter. (By camera, I mean the cameras that took pictures of original artwork to ultimately create printing plates for the presses.)

    When I used to post more often on this site, I wrote up my feelings about it here:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/56369/827656/post.ashx#827656

    I believe it was David Taciak I was talking to (also in Photoplate at the time) who joked with me about a certain artist at 124 who might have been crazy enough to try putting his initials, or some other form of signature, on a piece of art. (David finally got transferred from Photoplate to a permanent position in the Art Dept.) But as I mention in the link above, it was more trouble to keep accidental "subliminals" OUT of the artwork. We'd often see something that came too close to looking like a face in a bush or cloud, or the smear of erasures that didn't "drop out" as well as the artists hoped. We'd often have to shoot something 10 times on the camera to avoid places where we suspected the final print was going to have unrealistic looking water reflections, or shadows that were too strong, or the like. We were pretty good, but sometimes the artist would sometimes see something on the proof that we missed, and sometimes they'd redo it, or we'd touch up the art for them.

    In reality, very few of the artists were actually very good at folds in cloth and clothing, or folds in the skin of a hand or wrinkled brow. When an artist is drawing, they will often see a face forming in the cloud and redo it. Even a photograph that might be copied for a picture can have branches making swastikas, and crosses, or clouds that look like a fist "flipping a bird" and the artist is sometimes aware of these problems in a graphic or photograph and UNDOES these things in the art even where the original innocent photograph accidentally created them. (Photos are sometimes too perfect, and don't look natural enough without changes.) But that doesn't mean the artist is going to catch all the subtle things that can show up in his final art AT ALL ANGLES. Some bored person at the Watchtower Study is going to scrutinize a picture from upside-down or sideways and see a face that the artist didn't catch, or a "NINA" in someone's hair.

    Also, we were always trying to get used to how the new printing methods were going to treat color and shadow. And then sometimes you guys would just lay the ink on too thick (lol) and it was unpredictable.

    I think that a lot of people don't realize that the mind is pre-wired to pick out faces from the surroundings and certain "out of place" objects, shapes and edges - even if these differencxes are extremely subtle. Too many straight lines in nature will jar the mind and make us conjure up a man-made object. Even babies are psychologically wired to pick up on the slightest variations in faces. Everyone sees a man in the moon. Animals with honed hunting instincts have extremely keen senses for picking out "edges" that don't belong: such as fur among leaves, eyes hiding behind bushes. And there have been numerous studies of how the human mind will automatically get tricked to fill in white spaces with imaginary "suggested" edges.

    I haven't given much thought to why so many people tend to find "demonic" images. But faces tend to be unavoidable, and especially the ones that are missed in quality control will often be distorted and therefore might naturally look demonic. It's almost a cliche that a frightened, restless child can see a few extra claws and scary faces in the shadows and branches of a tree scratching near his window after the lights go out. Perhaps it's somewhat analagous that those who now see the dark and scary side of the Watchtower will, therefore, pick up on a few more of these problems in Watchtower artwork, even if it's no more purposeful than those random scratchings of branches through the glass, darkly.

    Greg

  • Tom Cabeen
    Tom Cabeen

    Great posts, Greg, both this one and the one you provided the link for.

    You obviously thought the whole thing out more thoroughly than I did. I just sort of shot from the hip because in my experience it is hard enough to get things to work out even when you have everyone helping you and you are wide open about everything.

    I agree with you completely, and I can confirm that you have described the situation there just about perfectly.

    Tom

  • TheListener
    TheListener

    Can anyone provide an update on Tim Pappas?

  • TheListener
    TheListener

    Tom,

    Can you provide some stories on what being friends with Sydlik was like?

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    Tom,

    In what building did you live?

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    GymBob,

    Recently, I heard news about Norm Brekke. He is still in Blyn NY He was cong overseer until last year he let someone else preside. I saw him a couple of years ago too. Short stubby bro, he looked the same only older But you would recognize him. Who was PO in your cong while you were at Bethel?

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    I didnt see how bethelites liked going to the Gilead graduattion in upper New York. Man, I did not want to go . It lasted a long time. I couldnt wait for it to end. I gave my tickets to bethelite friends that had their family over in excahnge for theirs at a latter date but the wts prohibited doing that later on. Hours and hours of sitting down and listenning to lectures. I had work at the asseblies so the time went by fast there. It takes a lot of discipline to sit throuh hours and hours and hours of talks, and we did it back then

  • biff mcfly
    biff mcfly

    gymbob,

    i think i might know you. don't want to shout out your last name if you're not comfortable with that. did you trade me your skis for a pistol in Glasgow, Kentucky in 1986?

  • Seeker4
    Seeker4

    Gamaliel, I remember you from earlier years. Good to hear from you again.

    I had a few friends in the art department - Sau Ling Chain and Eunice Spatz - who are still there. I totally agree with your subliminal image post. It was excellent and helps put an end to that stupidity from an insider with no agenda. Thanks.

    I often wonder about the Spatzs and the Chains. They are bright people,Cyril Chain got an engineering degree before coming to Bethel, works in writing and used to teach Chinese at Gilead, and I know they have had some issues. Eunice's brother is a close friend of mine. We had a hour-long phone conversation yesterday. He's a faded JW in Florida. He feels that they are probably one of those couples, now in their 60s, who just keep their thoughts to themselves and know Bethel will take care of them as long as there is a Bethel.

    Also, did you know a George and Phyllis Smith - he ran the photography department at one time, I believe? Not sure if they are still at Bethel, but haven't heard differently. Their son married a close friend of mine. Both are still JWs, but they are now divorced. An odd arrangement.

    Thanks for these posts.

    S4

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit