There are records that are very suggesitve.
Weren't we supposed to burn them, or at least get rid of them? Oooh boy, I do crack myself up sometimes.
Burn, you need to read what you are quoting. You can't, even though the Society does it on a regular basis, pull information out of context and present it as fact. And I quote from the link YOU provided:
Fringe historians often compare the content of this papyrus with Exodus, the second book of the Bible [1]. Similarities between Egyptian texts and the Bible are easily found, and it is reasonable to assume Egyptian influence on the Hebrews, given their at times close contacts. But to conclude from such parallelisms that the Ipuwer Papyrus describes Egypt at the time of the Exodus, requires a leap of faith not everybody is willing to make.
And here's the footnote reference for the above:
[1] Influenced by the revisionist historians of the second half of the 20th century who could not find any archaeological proofs for the historicity of the earlier Bible stories, their value as historical records came to be doubted. Before that time most Egyptologists, having grown up in the Christian West, accepted these accounts as being, at least in part, historically correct.
Sttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerike one!