IsaacJS2, if you are going to write a balanced article, you are going to have to read the contributions you receive a little more carefully. Those comments I posted are not mine, but those of a JW apologist.
Anyone find any decent pro-Witness sites?
by IsaacJS2 34 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
-
crazyblondeb
http://www.betterdaysarecoming.com
http://hufffamliy.com/index.html
I don't know anything about these sites......just so you know
-
Big Tex
Those comments I posted are not mine, but those of a JW apologist.
I thought that was pretty clear when I read your post.
Used to be the best active JW site was JWZone. But then the admin started reading this site and elsewhere and finally left, thus shutting down his site.
Chris
-
-
IsaacJS2
IsaacJS2, if you are going to write a balanced article, you are going to have to read the contributions you receive a little more carefully. Those comments I posted are not mine, but those of a JW apologist.
So glad to hear that. I was like, whoa! Very sorry about the misunderstanding, though. My bad.
I didn't see any indication that you were still quoting from someone since it was just printed as regular text after the boxed quote. I naturally thought you were saying this to me directly and had no way of knowing that you still quoting from someone else. Anyway, thanks a lot for the post and again, real sorry about the misunderstanding. I hope you can see how I made such a mistake. No hard feelings, I hope.
IsaacJ
-
The Dragon
The whole OT is an oxymoron isn't it?
-
Marcel
pro-sites are boring, because they are just copies (mostly in own words but the same content) of WT publications. the author of the website is neither allowed nor willing to put any of his own beliefs into play. that make them pointless. just read jw books and youve full info.
additionally many of the authors will bow to the organisation and shut down their website. in the cases i know it was always strongly suggested to shut down the website. -
jgnat
Consider, also, IsaacJS82, how you replied. There was a fair bit of emotion in your response, and these are the very arguments that a JW apologist would use for your article. Practice pulling out the logical fallacies in his argument.
-
besty
http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/ domain was registered in July 2006 so seems quite recent comprehensive attempt at debunking 587BCE and the UN fiasco
-
jeanV
http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/ domain was registered in July 2006 so seems quite recent comprehensive attempt at debunking 587BCE and the UN fiasco
I confirm. I only looked at the 587/607 part. It sounds very nice to the uninformed. Just for info, Jeffro wrote a very good rebuttal in here: http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/119819/1.ashx which can also be found in his blog http://jeffreyd.no-ip.com/wordpress/index.php/jehovahs-witnesses-and-1914/response-to-607-website/