Hi Scully,
So you admit that this debate and your challenge to atheists is futile. Good. We're getting somewhere.
It is amazing that so many atheist KEEP thinking that my original point of this thread had ANYTHING to do with religion???? I just don't get it! I don't know how else to say it????
Sounds like spiritual fixation.... how ironical.....
So you admit that you're behaving like a troll. Fair enough. I imagine that in short order your posting privileges will be restricted accordingly, based on the following Posting Guidelines:
D'OH!!! Wwoopps!!!! I keep forgetting that my form of "humor?" doesn't always translate well to the written page. Sorry for breaking any rules or hurting any feelings... Please know that was unintentionally poor judgement!.... P.S. What's a "troll"?
Hi Hillary-step,
It is no so much a 'tired' song as a sinful one to religionists
Sorry for clouding up the waters by answering questions about my beliefs.... my criticism was never based upon "sinfulness" or "religiousness"
Hi Sass,
Not everybody is interested in the eggs. I'm one of the adults who put the eggs there to keep the kids quiet for half an hour (or if you want a more technicolour version, to put a little magic and mystery in their lives). Whatever floats your boat mate. Thank you!.... You're a class act! We have another winner! Hey Asheron, We did???? Are you are admiting that you have no proof of the existance of God? If not tangible proof or evidence, what measuring stick should we use to test the God theory to an open minded person??
When the point of proving God's existence has come up. I've admitted that any emperical evidence is completely subjective. What measuring stick?... That's up to the "rules" set by the individual.... most everyone has a different (or slightly different) standard for what constitutes "proof"
And dont go tryin to start up another debate about another subject. We aint done wit dis one, I rekon!
This new debate is for the purpose of establishing the fallibilty of the current precident... then we can go back to the first debate and (hopefully) shed some light on the point that I have been unsuccessfully trying to make about hypocrisy for EIGHT-LONG-EXHAUSTING-PAGES------- P.S. ...... It's STILL NOT about God!
I realize that you get THAT but not everyone does....
In 2000, Andreas Bartels and Semir Zeki of University College, London, located the areas of the brain activated by romantic love. They took students who said they were madly in love, put them into a brain scanner, and looked at their patterns of brain activity.
The results were surprising. For a start, a relatively small area of the human brain is active in love, compared with that involved in, say, ordinary friendship. “It is fascinating to reflect”, the pair conclude, “that the face that launched a thousand ships should have done so through such a limited expanse of cortex.” The second surprise was that the brain areas active in love are different from the areas activated in other emotional states, such as fear and anger. Parts of the brain that are love-bitten include the one responsible for gut feelings, and the ones which generate the euphoria induced by drugs such as cocaine. So the brains of people deeply in love do not look like those of people experiencing strong emotions, but instead like those of people snorting coke. Love, in other words, uses the neural mechanisms that are activated during the process of addiction. “We are literally addicted to love,” Dr Young observes.
NIIICCEEEE! ..............Can a have a little time to prepare my rebuttal?
