by Simon 93 Replies latest watchtower scandals
I read the info at Wiki, and I have to say that I thought it was pretty balanced. It seemed accurate, there was lots of info about the origins and schisms, the constantly changing teachings, the many srewed up dates were listed, and the links at the end were dominated by anti-JW sites.
S4
Anyone remember the other version?
That pic is funny as hell Ballistic.
Interesting...that revert did not take long... ..truth.ceeker..
Have any of you reviewed the articles in http://www.allexperts.com/ ? A few JW contributors lurk there. Check out Janko
One can make a chnage and then have wikipedia notify that person of any changes and where exactly those chnages are. No doubt a JW zealot is doing this.
On Jgnat's link to "allexperts" I notice a guy named Brandon Harper who is registered as both an "ardent" (his word) JW and a critic of JWs. This strikes me as dishonest, and I've told him what I think.
All I can say about this is if you're going to edit an article on Wikipedia, or add anything at all, make sure you reference! Don't put opinions or interpretations or anything that can't be shown from their own books and magazines.
Kwin
Hee-hee! I was an "ardent" JW. I am a critic. I am expert in both. The worst nightmare of the WTS, in a way. No one knows better how to deconstruct doctrinal supports better than one who was skilled at putting them together to begin with, eh? Heh-heh-heh...
Respectfully,
AuldSoul (a.k.a. Brandon Harper)
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses
LOL, that was so funny. I like the last line
"to tell people about a paradise where people live forever and play with vegetarian lions and all that other stuff. Despite their fervent marketing efforts, nobody is really sure what they speak about. People in response just pretend not to be home, or show up to the door naked, which shocks the sexually repressed Jehovah's Witnesses. ""
AuldSoul, so you're Brandon.
